Women -- Employment -- United States; Women -- Social and moral questions
At the very outset, however, two rival decorums confronted each other.
The same centuries of tradition which had, officially, reserved the
practice of medicine for men, had assigned to women the exclusive
control of the practice of midwifery. It was assumed that midwifery did
not require the assistance of medical art,—that the woman in labor
traversed a purely physiological crisis, and required only the
attendance of kindness, patience, and native sagacity,—all obtainable
without scientific knowledge, from her own sex. This being taken for
granted, the propriety of limiting such attendance to women appeared so
self-evident, that, from the beginning of the world till the eighteenth
century A.D., the custom was not seriously questioned. There is an exact
parallelism between the relations of men to midwifery and of women to
medicine. The limitation of sex in each case was decided by a tradition
so immense, as to be mistaken for a divinely implanted instinct,
intended by Providence as one of the fundamental safeguards of society
and of morals. In each case the invasion by one sex of a “sphere”
hitherto monopolized by the other, aroused the coarsest antagonism of
offended delicacy. In each case finally, a real basis existed for the
traditional etiquette: there _was_ some reason for protesting against
the introduction of the male accoucheur into the lying-in room, or of
the ardent young girl into the medical school. But in each case,
whatever reasons for protest existed, were outnumbered and outweighed by
others, to whose greater importance they were finally compelled to give
way. Other things being equal, it _was_ unpleasant for a woman to be
attended in the crisis of her confinement by a man. But when the
necessity for knowledge was recognized, when men became skilled while
midwives remained ignorant,—the choice was no longer possible; the
greater decorum of female midwifery was obliged to yield to the greater
safety of enlightened masculine practice. Similarly, it _was_
occasionally unpleasant for young women students to find themselves
engaged in certain subjects of medical study together with classes of
young men. But in proportion as midwifery became enlarged by the new
province of gynæcology, did occasions multiply on which it was extremely
unpleasant for non-medical women to be medically treated by men. The
difficulties of educating a relatively few women in medicine were
compelled to be accepted, in order to avert the far greater difficulties
of medical treatment for a very large number of women.
The history of medical women in the United States, to which these pages
exclusively apply, may be divided into seven periods, as follows:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account