Women -- Employment -- United States; Women -- Social and moral questions
For twenty-five years the battle was waged, and arguments advanced pro
and con, of substantially the same nature as those which have already
been sufficiently quoted. A circular was sent to the 1343 members of the
society, asking the following question: Do you favor the admission of
women to the Society on the same terms with men? To this circular, 1132
replies were received, of which 709 were in the affirmative, 400 in the
negative, while 23 were indifferent. “It was thus evident that a
considerable majority of the Society, seven to four of all who answered
the circular, favor the admission of women.”[118]
In June, 1875, a committee of five was chosen from the society to report
whether duly educated women could not be admitted to membership. In
October a majority reported in favor of examining for membership men and
women without distinction. But the minority objected so vigorously, that
the whole matter was postponed indefinitely. In 1878, another committee
was appointed: in June, 1879, the members were found equally divided;
the subject was referred back to the committee, who, in October of the
same year, advised no action. But this time the minority reported to
instruct the censors to admit women for examination. The councilors
voted, 48 to 38, to adopt the minority report.[119]
But the end was not yet, for in February, 1880, the censors of Suffolk
County (including the city of Boston), voted that the society be advised
to rescind its vote of October. This, however, was never done; but,
after some further delay, the first female candidate, Dr. Emma Call, a
graduate from Ann Arbor, passed a satisfactory examination and was
admitted. The decisive step once taken, other women passed in readily,
and 1889, ten years from the date of the conclusion of the famous
controversy, a dozen women sat down to the annual banquet of the
society, among whom was one invited guest from another State. The “moral
tone” did not seem to be “perceptibly lowered,” on this occasion.
In 1882, Dr. Chadwick published a tabulated summary of the dates at
which various State societies had admitted women to membership.
In 1872, Kansas, Iowa; in 1874, Vermont; in 1875, Maine, New York, Ohio;
in 1876, California, Indiana; in 1878, New Hampshire; in 1879,
Minnesota, Massachusetts; in 1880, Connecticut; in 1881, Pennsylvania.
Rhode Island, Illinois, and Oregon also had women members, but the date
of their first admission was not known. Thus seventeen societies
contained, in 1882, 115 female members—that of New York alone having
forty-two, much the largest of all.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account