Women -- Employment -- United States; Women -- Social and moral questions
The aggressions of the slaveocracy during the first half century of our
national existence alarmed the non-slaveholding portion of the country.
And almost at the same time, in the progress of civilization, the era
was reached when the enlightened conscience of the civilized world
demanded the abolition of slavery. Slowly routed from the dominions of
other nations by the manumission of the bondmen, or the purchase of
their freedom, slavery seemed at last to have intrenched itself on
American soil, and to dominate American civilization. A struggle with it
was inevitable. Some of the grandest men and women of the nation entered
the lists against it, for the early Abolitionists were remarkable
people. It is only necessary to mention the names of some of the leaders
in that holy war, to summon up visions of manly beauty and womanly
grace, men and women endowed with ability, culture, character,
refinement, courage, and social charm. Their public speech blazed with
remorseless moral logic, and thrilled with matchless eloquence, so that
crowds flocked to hear them, wherever they spoke. Garrison and Phillips,
Sumner and Parker, Birney and Pierpont, Gerrit Smith and Theodore
Weld—what men of their day surpassed them in manliness, moral force, and
persuasive and convincing speech? They were supplemented and
complemented by noble women, unlike them, and yet every whit their
peers—Maria Weston Chapman and Lydia Maria Child, Sarah and Angelina
Grimké, Lucretia Mott and Abby Kelly, Helen Garrison and Ann Greene
Phillips.[163]
Mrs. Chapman and Mrs. Child put to the service of the great reform pens
tipped with flame, and wielded with consummate energy and skill. And the
Grimké sisters, who had manumitted their slaves in Charleston, S. C.,
and come North to advocate Antislavery doctrines, with Lucretia Mott and
Abby Kelly, entranced large audiences with their eloquent discourse, and
roused the dormant moral sense of their hearers into protest against the
colossal sin of the nation. Conservatives in church and state were
alarmed. War was declared against the eloquent women, and it was decided
that they should be silenced, and not allowed to act or vote in the
business meetings of the Antislavery Society. This brought about a
division in the organization before it had reached its first decade.
A double battle was now forced on the Garrisonian Abolitionists—a battle
for the rights of woman as well as for the freedom of the slave. The
doctrine of human rights was discussed anew, broadly and exhaustively,
and it was demonstrated that the rights of man and woman were identical.
Antislavery platforms resounded with the demand that liberty, justice,
and equality be accorded to women, and the anti-slavery press teemed
with arguments for women’s rights, which are repeated in the woman
suffrage meetings of the present time.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account