Women and economic evolution: or, The effects of industrial changes upon the status of womenMcMahon, Theresa Schmid
History
Women and economic evolution: or, The effects of industrial changes upon the status of women
McMahon, Theresa Schmid
Thesis (Ph. D.); Women -- Employment; Women -- Social and moral questions; Women -- Social conditions
The spirit of the time has corresponded to masculine achievement and
women’s progress has been measured by their success in adaptation. It
is of little consequence that women excel in industry in a period of
military precedence, or socially in an epoch of industrialism, since
the standard of measurement is fixed by masculine performance. The
ideal to be attained by either sex is always a masculine one.
FOOTNOTES:
[4] Marshall, _Principles of Economics_, I, pp. 10-11. Ed. 4.
[5] Ward, _Pure Sociology_, p. 360.
[6] Quoted by Thomas, _Sex and Society_, p. 125.
[7] Mason, _Woman’s Share in Primitive Culture_, pp. 2-3.
[8] Thomas, _Sex and Society_, p. 134.
[9] Westermarck, _The Position of Women in Early Civilization_, _The
American Journal of Sociology_, Nov., 1904, p. 410.
[10] Westermarck, _The Position of Women in Early Civilization_, The
American Journal of Sociology, Nov., 1904, p. 411.
[11] Spencer, _Principles of Sociology_, I, p. 747.
[12] Bücher, _Industrial Evolution_, p. 96.
CHAPTER II
THE STATUS OF WOMEN IN EARLY HISTORICAL TIMES
The world furnishes many examples of the rise and decline of
civilizations before our era. Their art and literature often show
social institutions comparing favorably with those of modern times.
Almost without exception their decline can be traced to the invasion
of people of less culture but greater warlike propensities. The
institutions of these warlike peoples are the ones which survived, and
upon which rest our modern institutions.
As we have seen the primitive society, militancy favors a greater
differentiation of sex status and of work than industrialism. In the
primarily industrial nations, men’s and women’s work often overlap, and
although we can recognize a sex division of work, the line constantly
shifts to the economic advantage of women. In a militant society, the
women of the higher classes are often shown a deference unknown in the
lower classes, but this deference is not shown them as a sex alone,
but because of their relation to those who stand highest in the state.
Where the women of the higher classes enjoy rights and privileges
other than those reserved to them by the state, they are bestowed
upon the individual alone, and not upon the sex in general. They have
their basis in family ties making the family a unit in its economic
interests, as well as in its social and political interests. No matter
how conservative men may be in their attitude toward the political,
social, and industrial equality of men and women, their prejudices do
not weigh against family interests, or apply to the females of their
own families.
Militant types of society have not recognized the political rights
of women as women. But for all that their women have often played
important roles in history by virtue of the power coming to them
through some male relative who was more anxious to delegate his power
to them than to see it pass to strangers, or to men of remoter blood
relationship.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account