Women in English Life from Mediæval to Modern Times, Vol. IHill, Georgiana
History
Women in English Life from Mediæval to Modern Times, Vol. I
Hill, Georgiana
Women -- Great Britain; Women -- History; Women -- Social conditions
Women are now so necessary to stage performances that it is odd to
find arguments gravely set forth in favour of their presence. The
reasons assigned for introducing women were that men failed to act
women’s parts satisfactorily; that boys were no more suitable than
girls, and some of the “boys” were middle-aged men, who could not
properly impersonate young maidens. When in the reign of Charles II.
patents were granted to Killigrew and Davenant for their theatres, the
following regulations appeared--
“And forasmuch as many plays formerly acted do contain several
profane, obscene, and scurrilous passages, and the women’s
parts therein have been acted by men in the habits of women
at which some have taken offence; for the preventing of these
abuses for the future we do strictly charge, command and enjoin
that from henceforth no new plays shall be acted by either of
the said companies containing any passages offensive to piety
and good manners, nor any old or revived play containing any
such offensive passages as aforesaid, until the same shall
be corrected and purged by the said masters or governors of
the said respective companies from all such offensive and
scandalous passages as aforesaid. And we do likewise permit and
give leave that all the women’s parts to be acted in either of
the said two companies from this time to come may be performed
by women, so long as these recreations which by reason of the
abuses aforesaid were scandalous and offensive may by such
reformation be esteemed not only harmless delights, but useful
and instructive representations of human life, by such of our
good subjects as shall resort to see the same.”
The character of the plays acted in the seventeenth century fitted the
temper of the times. Wycherley, Congreve, Mrs. Aphra Behn, and their
brothers and sisters in the craft were not too outspoken for the taste
of that day. Evelyn, it is true, was a severe censor, but he was a man
of the world who had travelled and seen many things. “In London,” he
says, “there were more wicked and obscene plays permitted than in all
the world besides.” And this, too, in Lent, which added much to the
offence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account