Women -- Employment -- Great Britain; Women labor union members -- Great Britain; Working class women -- Great Britain
I went to York, to buy wool, and at that time it averaged about 1s.
per pound. I then came home, sorted and combed it myself. After being
combed, it was oiled and closed, that is, the long end of the wool and
the short end were put together to form a skein. It took a number of
skeins to make a top, each top making exactly a pound. Then I took it
to hand-spinners 20 or 30 miles distant. The mother or head of the
family plucked the tops into pieces the length of the wool, and gave
it to the different branches of the family to spin, who could spin
about 9 or 10 hanks per day; for the spinning I gave one half penny
per hank, and sometimes 1/2d. for every 24 hanks over.
Another interesting account is given by Bamford:
Farms were most cultivated for the production of milk, butter and
cheese.... The farming was mostly of that kind which was soonest and
most easily performed, and it was done by the husband and other males
of the family, whilst the wife and daughters and maid servants, if
there were any of the latter, attended to the churning, cheese-making,
and household work, and when that was finished, they busied themselves
in carding, slubbing, and spinning of wool and cotton, as well as
forming it into warps for the loom. The husband and sons would next,
at times when farm labour did not call them abroad, size the warp, dry
it, and beam it in the loom, and either they or the females, whichever
happened to be least otherwise employed, would weave the warp down. A
farmer would generally have 3 or 4 looms in his house.
Of course it is not to be inferred that the women thus employed were
always free to control or spend their own earnings; in law they
undoubtedly were not, if married. The domestic system so picturesquely
described by Defoe (in his _Tour_), under which the family worked
together, each, from the oldest to the youngest, doing his or her part, no
doubt often involved a quite patriarchal distribution and control of the
resulting earnings. Still the mention of women as separate and individual
earners that occurs often in eighteenth-century works on the subject must
indicate that they were attaining a greater measure of individual
recognition and self-determination than formerly.[9]
It is interesting also to notice that the cloth industry was sometimes
carried on socially in the eighteenth century. Bradford Dale was covered
with weavers and spinners, and the women and children of Allerton,
Thornton, and other villages in the valley, used to flock on sunny days
with their spinning wheels to some favourite pleasant spot, and work in
company.[10]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account