Women wanted: The story written in blood red letters on the horizon of the Great World WarDaggett, Mabel Potter
History
Women wanted: The story written in blood red letters on the horizon of the Great World War
Daggett, Mabel Potter
Women -- Employment; World War, 1914-1918 -- Women
This memorial from the Finnish women coincides perfectly in spirit
with the new laws in process of construction for Scandinavia. When the
Dutch Parliament, which has just conferred a new measure of suffrage
on the women of the Netherlands, was in 1917 debating the matter, an
alarmed reactionary rose to object: “But how can married women vote?
For married women are not free. They are like soldiers in barracks, who
have lost the liberty to express their thoughts.”
THE NEW FATHERHOOD
Sir, that’s just the point. But the liberty that was lost, is found. No
one, as we have seen, is going to compel this new woman to be anything
that she does not want to be. Let us not forget this now as she goes on
talking. For she is coming presently to that which is at the heart of
the whole woman question, nay, more, the human question.
“Dear,” she is going to say, “there is that which matters more than all
the rest for us now to decide. It’s the children, the children are
on my mind.” Then she is going to emphasise how important it is that
parenthood shall be equalised. By the laws that men have made about it,
quite universally, equally in fact in England and Germany and France
and Italy and Russia and the United States, the father is the only
parent. His will decides its religion, its education, and all of the
conditions under which the child shall be reared. There are a few of
the United States, most notably those where women vote and one or two
others in which pressure has been brought to bear by the feminists,
where the law has been corrected. Also in Scandinavia and in Australia,
as soon as women have come into the vote, one of their first efforts
has been to establish what is known as “equal guardianship,” the right
of a married mother to her own child. To an unmarried mother, by a
strange perversity in the statutes of men, is conceded not only all the
right to the child but there is put upon her all of the responsibility
of its parenthood.
The new woman is not going to rest content to have it stand that
way. Already the world is being forced to a new deal for childhood.
The sins of the fathers are being lifted from the children on whom
society in the past has so heavily visited them. A baby has broken no
law. Why brand it, then, as “illegitimate”? War babies crying in all
lands have brought statesmen to startled attention. Government after
government has arranged for what is called the “separation allowance”
to go to the woman at home to whom the soldier at the front knows
that it belongs—even though she has no marriage lines to show. So the
War Office pen writes off one discrimination. Of children who used to
be called “illegitimate,” 50,000 born annually in England and 180,000
born annually in Germany will now be entitled to start life with equal
financial government aid that the others get.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account