Woodstock: An historical sketchBowen, Clarence Winthrop
History
Woodstock: An historical sketch
Bowen, Clarence Winthrop
Woodstock (Conn. : Town) -- History
It should now be related how Woodstock, settled under Massachusetts,
became a part of the State of Connecticut. Massachusetts claimed
Woodstock, because the grant was supposed to lie within her chartered
bounds as surveyed in 1642, and that claim was what Major Daniel
Gookin referred to when he rebuked the agent of Uncas in 1674, during
his visit with John Eliot, at Woodstock. But Massachusetts did not
believe that the line of 1642 was wrong when she confirmed the grant
to the Roxbury settlers. She even censured Woodstock for daring to ask
Connecticut to confirm a portion of the grant that fell south of this
line. Though Connecticut justly held she was entitled to Woodstock,
according to the terms of her charter, she was, nevertheless, willing
to forego her claim to this town, provided Massachusetts would allow
her to have the jurisdiction over other territory claimed by both
colonies. But the repeated attempts to settle the controversy failed,
and it was not till 1713 that an agreement was finally concluded. For
the privilege of having jurisdiction over Woodstock and the other
towns claimed by both sides, Massachusetts agreed to compensate
Connecticut, by giving her unimproved lands in Western Massachusetts
and New Hampshire. These lands were therefore called "equivalent
lands," and were sold by Connecticut for $2,274, and the money given
to Yale College. Woodstock was entirely satisfied with this agreement,
as all her associations were with Massachusetts. But in 1747 the town
thought that her taxes, which had been increased owing to the French
and Spanish wars,[83] would be lighter, and her privileges greater,
if she followed Suffield, Enfield, and Somers "in trying to get off
to Connecticut." So Woodstock applied to Connecticut, claiming that
the agreement of 1713 had been made without her consent. After much
deliberation, Connecticut voted in 1749 to receive the town, and
declared the agreement of 1713 not binding. Woodstock was delighted at
being received into Connecticut, and at a memorable town meeting[84]
made Thomas Chandler and Henry Bowen the first members of the General
Assembly. Though Woodstock has since 1749 been a part of this State,
Massachusetts would never formally yield jurisdiction over the town,
and even as late as 1768 warned the inhabitants not to pay taxes to
Connecticut. In fact had it not been for the Revolution, Massachusetts
might still be claiming Woodstock.[85] It might be added that
Woodstock, in being annexed to Connecticut, lost about three thousand
acres north of the colony line. This strip of land was known as the
"Middlesex Gore" for forty-five years, and was annexed to Dudley and
Sturbridge in 1794.
After becoming a part of Connecticut, Woodstock was anxious that the
northern half of Windham County should be made into a separate county,
of which Woodstock should be the shire-town, but as Pomfret also
desired the county seat, and as the State seemed unwilling to act, the
project fell through.[86]
IX.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account