Working Life of Women in the Seventeenth CenturyClark, Alice
History
Working Life of Women in the Seventeenth Century
Clark, Alice
Women -- Employment -- Great Britain -- History -- 17th century; Women -- Great Britain -- History -- 17th century
Sick and wounded soldiers were tended at the Savoy, where there were
thirteen Sisters, whose joint salaries amounted to £52 16s. 8d. per
annum.[558] Among the orders for the patients, nurses and widows in the
Savoy and other hospitals in and about London occur the following
regulations:—4ᵗʰˡʸ “That every soldier or nurse ... that shall profanely
sweare” to pay 12d. for the first offence, 12d. for the second, and be
expelled for the third. 8ᵗʰˡʸ “That if any souldier shall marye any of
the nurses of the said houses whilst hee is there for care or (recov)ery
they both shall be turned forth of the House. 11ᵗʰˡʸ No soldier under
cure to have their (wiv)es lodge with them there except by the
approbation of the Phisicion. 12ᵗʰˡʸ No nurse to be dismissed without
the approval of 2 of the Treasurers for the relief of maimed soldiers at
least. Nurses to be chosen from among the widows of soldiers if there
are among them those that be fit, and those to have 5s. per weeke as
others usually have had for the service. 14ᵗʰˡʸ soldiers, wounded and
sick, outside the hospitals not to have more than 4s. per week. Those in
St. Thomas’s and Bartholomew’s hospital 2s. a week, those in their
parents’, masters’ or friends’ houses, according to their necessities,
but not more than 4s. per week. 15ᵗʰˡʸ Soldiers’ widows to receive
according to their necessities, but not more than 4s. a week. 19ᵗʰˡʸ If
any of the nurses ... shalbee negligent in their duties or in giving due
attendance to the ... sicke souldiers by daye or night or shall by
scoulding, brawlinge or chidinge make any disturbance in the said
hospitall, she shall forfeite 12d. for 1st offence, week’s pay for
second, be dismissed for the third. 20ᵗʰˡʸ If any widow after marriage
shall come and receive weekly pensions as a soldier’s widow contrary to
the ordinance of parlᵗ he which hath married her to repay it, & if he is
unable she shall be complained of to the nearest J.P. and be punished as
a de(ceiver).”[559]
Footnote 558:
Stow, _London_ I., p. 211.
Footnote 559:
_S.P.D._, dxxxix, 231., November 15, 1644.
There was one nurse for every ten patients in the Dublin hospitals, and
the salary was £10 per annum, out of which she had to find her
board.[560]
Footnote 560:
_S.P.D._, Interreg: I, 62, p. 633., 17 Aug., 1649.
The opportunity which the hospitals afforded for training in the art of
nursing was entirely wasted. The idea that the personal tending of the
sick and forlorn poor would be a religious service of special value in
the sight of God had vanished, and their care, no longer transformed by
the devotion of religious enthusiasm, appeared a sordid duty, only fit
for the lowest class in the community. Well-to-do men relieved their
consciences by bequeathing money for the endowment of hospitals, but the
sense of social responsibility was not fostered in girls, and the
expression of charitable instincts was almost confined in the case of
women to their personal relations.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account