Working Life of Women in the Seventeenth CenturyClark, Alice
History
Working Life of Women in the Seventeenth Century
Clark, Alice
Women -- Employment -- Great Britain -- History -- 17th century; Women -- Great Britain -- History -- 17th century
Events, however, were taking place which would soon curtail the practice
of women whose training was confined to personal experience, tradition
and casual study. The established associations of physicians, surgeons
and apothecaries, although of recent growth, demanded and obtained, like
other companies, exclusive privileges. Their policy fell in with the
Government’s desire to control the practice of medicine, in order to
check witchcraft. Statute 3, Henry VIII., enacted that “none should
exercise the Faculty of Physick or Surgery within the City of _London_
or within Seven Miles of the same, unless first he were examined,
approved and admitted by the Bishop of _London_, or the Dean of _St.
Paul’s_, calling to him or them Four Doctors of Physick, and for Surgery
other expert Persons in that Faculty, upon pain of Forfeiture of £5 for
every Month they should occupy Physick or Surgery, not thus admitted”
because “that common Artificers, as Smiths, Weavers, and Women, boldly
and accustomably took upon them great Cures, and Things of great
Difficulty, in the which they partly used Sorceries and Witchcraft, and
partly applied such Medicines unto the Diseased, as were very noyous,
and nothing meet therefore.”[600]
Footnote 600:
Stow, _London_ I., p. 132.
The restrictions were extended to the provinces. A Charter given to the
Company of Barber-Surgeons at Salisbury in 1614 declared that “No
surgeon or barber is to practise any surgery or barbery, unless first
made a free citizen, and then a free brother of the company. Whereas,
also, there are divers women and others within this city, altogether
unskilled in the art of chirurgery, who do oftentimes take cures on
them, to the great danger of the patient, it is therefore ordered, that
no such woman, or any other, shall take or meddle with any cure of
chirurgery, wherefore they, or any of them shall have or take any money,
benefit or other reward for the same, upon pain that every delinquent
shall for every cure to be taken in hand, or meddled with, contrary to
this order, unless she or they shall be first allowed by this Company,
forfeit and lose to the use of this Company the sum of ten
shillings.”[601]
Footnote 601:
Hoare, Sir R. C., _History of Modern Wilts_, Vol. VI., p. 341.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account