Working Life of Women in the Seventeenth CenturyClark, Alice
History
Working Life of Women in the Seventeenth Century
Clark, Alice
Women -- Employment -- Great Britain -- History -- 17th century; Women -- Great Britain -- History -- 17th century
C. _Midwifery._
It has been shown that the employment of women in the arts of medicine,
nursing and teaching was chiefly, though not entirely, confined to the
domestic sphere; midwifery, on the other hand, though occasionally
practised by amateurs, was, in the majority of cases, carried on by
women who, whether skilled or unskilled, regarded it as the chief
business of their lives, and depended upon it for their maintenance. Not
only did midwifery exist on a professional basis from immemorial days,
but it was formerly regarded as a mystery inviolably reserved for women;
and though by the seventeenth century the barrier which excluded men had
broken down, the extent to which the profession had in the past been a
woman’s monopoly is shown by the fact that the men who now began to
practise the art were known as men-midwives.
The midwife held a recognised position in Society and was sometimes
well-educated and well-paid. Nothing is known as to the mediæval history
of midwifery in England; and possibly nothing ever will be known
concerning it, for the Englishwoman of that period had no impulse to
commit her experience and ideas to writing. All the wisdom which touched
her special sphere in life was transmitted orally from mother to
daughter, and thus at any change, like the Industrial Revolution, which
silently undermined the foundations of society, the traditional womanly
wisdom could vanish, leaving no trace behind it. Even in the Elizabethan
period and during the seventeenth century, when most women could read
and many could write, they show little tendency to record information
concerning their own affairs. But the profession of midwifery was then
no longer reserved exclusively for women. The first treatise on the
subject published in England was a translation by Raynold of “The Byrth
of Mankynd.” He says in his preface that the book had already been
translated into “Dutche, Frenche, Spanyshe and dyvers other languages.
In the which Countries there be fewe women that can reade, but they wyll
haue one of these bookes alwayes in readinesse ... it beinge lykewyse
sette foorth in our Englyshe speeche ... it may supply the roome and
place of a good Mydwyfe, ... and truly ... there be syth the fyrst
settynge forth of this booke, right many honourable Ladyes, & other
Worshypfull Gentlewomen, which have not disdayned the oftener by the
occasion of this booke to frequent and haunt women in theyr labours,
caryinge with them this booke in theyr handes, and causyng such part of
it as doth chiefely concerne the same pourpose, to be read before the
mydwyfe, and the rest of the women then beyng present; whereby ofttymes,
then all haue been put in remembraunce of that, wherewith the laboryng
woman hath bene greatly comforted, and alleuiated of her thronges and
travayle.... But here now let not the good Mydwyves be offended with
that, that is spoken of the badde. For verily there is no science, but
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account