Working Life of Women in the Seventeenth CenturyClark, Alice
History
Working Life of Women in the Seventeenth Century
Clark, Alice
Women -- Employment -- Great Britain -- History -- 17th century; Women -- Great Britain -- History -- 17th century
Labourers naturally were unwilling to hire cottages while there was a
possibility of inducing the justices to provide one on the waste rent
free. The churchwardens of Great Wymondley forwarded a certificate
stating “that the poor people of the said parish that are old and not
able to work are all provided for and none of the poor people of the
said parish have been driven to wander into other unions to beg or ask
relief, for this thirty years last past. This Nathaniel Thrussel, which
now complains, is a lusty young man, able to work and always brought up
to husbandry, his wife, a young woman, always brought up to work, and
know both how to perform their work they are hired to do, and have at
present but one child, but did not care to pay rent for a hired house
when he had one nor endeavour to hire a house for himself when he
wants.”[148]
Footnote 148:
_Hertford Co. Rec._, Vol. I., p. 370, 1687.
The scarcity of cottages resulted in extortionate rents for those that
existed; Best noted that in his district “Mary Goodale and Richard
Miller have a cottage betwixt them; Mary Goodale hath two roomes, and
the orchard and payeth 6s. per annum; and Richard Miller, hayth one
roomestead and payeth 4s. per annum.... They usually lette their
cottages hereaboutes, for 10s. a piece, although they have not soe much
as a yard, or any backe side belonging to them.”[149]
Footnote 149:
Best, _Rural Econ._, p. 125.
The rents paid elsewhere are shown in the returns made in 1635 by the
Justices of the Peace for the Hundreds of Blofield and Walsham in
Norfolk concerning cottages and inmates:
Thos. Waters hath 3 inmates:
Wm. Wyley pays £1. per annum
Anthony Smith pays £1. per annum
Roger Goat pays 12s. per annum
“which are all poore labourers and have wifes and severall children and
if they be put out cannot be provided in this towne and by reason of
their charge and poverty are not likely to be taken elsewhere.”
“Wm. Browne hath 2 inmates:
Edmund Pitt 14s. per annum
Wm. Jostling 14s. per annum
that are very poor and impotent and take colleccion.
Wm. Reynoldes hath 2 inmates:
Anthony Durrant £1 16s. per annum
Wm. Yurely 16s. per annum
both are very poore labourers and have wifes and small children. Jas.
Candle owner of a cottage [has] Robert Fenn, 13s. a poore man. Anne
Linckhorne 1 inmate Philip Blunt that pay £1. 17. 0 that is a poore man
and hath wife and children.”[150]
Footnote 150:
_S.P.D._, cccx., 104, 1635. Returns made by Justices of the Peace.
Thus it appears that while a labourer who obtained a cottage on the
waste lived rent free, twenty or thirty shillings might be demanded from
those who were less fortunate.
Whatever money was extorted for rent meant so much less food for the
mother and children, for it has been shown that the family income was
insufficient for food alone, and left no margin for rent or clothes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account