World's End: A Story in Three BooksJefferies, Richard
General
World's End: A Story in Three Books
Jefferies, Richard
England -- Fiction; Inheritance and succession -- Fiction; Murder -- Fiction
Still there was not enough evidence to arrest Sibbold. The Swamp people
said he would run away, and if he did they would watch him and bring
him back. But Sibbold did nothing of the kind. He faced the inquiry
with a stern dignity which imposed on some.
First came the medical evidence. The doctor proved that the shot had
entered the left side, just below the heart, and had passed downwards.
It had entered all together—the pellets not spread about, but close
together, like a bullet, which proved that the gun had been fired very
close. Death must have been absolutely instantaneous. Deceased was in a
stooping posture when he received the charge.
The constable who had examined the premises, declared it as his
belief—as, indeed, it was the belief of everyone present—that the shot
had been fired from without the window. The shot itself could not have
smashed every pane—that was the concussion. The thatch had been
doubtless set on fire by a piece of the paper which had been used as
wadding.
When this had been said there was nothing more to be done, at least so
the jury thought. Suspect Sibbold as much as they would, they were
determined to protect him if possible. This was partly class-feeling,
and partly remembrance of the provocation.
But the Coroner was not to be put off so easily. He had Sibbold called,
and questioned him closely. He called James also, but they both stuck
to their tale; they had never heard the shot, etc. The Coroner sent for
Sibbold’s gun, keeping Sibbold and James at the inn where the inquest
was held meantime. It was brought. It told no tales: it was loaded.
Finally, the Coroner, still dissatisfied and vaguely suspicious, called
_Arthur_ Sibbold, who, white as a sheet, was sitting near on a bench
watching the proceedings.
He started at his name and looked round, but finally came forward.
Where had he been that night? He was at Bassett, a small town six miles
distant. What was his business there? what time did he leave? and so
on. Arthur answered, but not so clearly as was desired. He contradicted
himself as to the time at which he left Bassett, and got confused.
The Coroner’s suspicions shifted upon him. He must have arrived about
the time the shot was heard, yet he did not go indoors, did not show
himself till breakfast-time next morning. James vouched for that,
unasked. What was he doing all night?
Suspicion fell very strong on Arthur. But at this moment the wife of
the deceased started forward and declared her belief in his innocence,
recounting how he had learnt basket-making, etc, of the dead man, and
they had been on the most friendly terms.
Still, said the Coroner, he might have mistaken his man in the
uncertain light. Had he a gun? It was shown that the three Sibbolds had
but one gun; that Arthur never used a gun, being of a tender nature,
and often expressing his dislike to see birds wantonly slaughtered.
The Sibbolds were then, with the other witnesses, ordered out, and the
Coroner addressed the jury.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account