Worlds Within Worlds: The Story of Nuclear Energy, Volume 3 (of 3): Nuclear Fission; Nuclear Fusion; Beyond Fusion — John Shaqi
Worlds Within Worlds: The Story of Nuclear Energy, Volume 3 (of 3): Nuclear Fission; Nuclear Fusion; Beyond FusionAsimov, Isaac
History
Worlds Within Worlds: The Story of Nuclear Energy, Volume 3 (of 3): Nuclear Fission; Nuclear Fusion; Beyond Fusion
Asimov, Isaac
Nuclear energy -- Popular works
In 1969 the Soviet Union used a device called “Tokamak-3” (a Russian
abbreviation for their phrase for “electric-magnetic”) to keep a supply
of hydrogen-2, a millionth as dense as air, in place while heating it to
tens of millions of degrees for a hundredth of a second.
A little denser, a little hotter, a little longer—and controlled fusion
might become possible.[5]
BEYOND FUSION
Antimatter
Is there anything that lies beyond fusion?
When hydrogen undergoes fusion and becomes helium, only 0.7% of the
original mass of the hydrogen is converted to energy. Is it possible to
take a quantity of mass and convert all of it, every bit, to energy?
Surely that would be the ultimate energy source. Mass for mass, that
would deliver 140 times as much energy as hydrogen fusion would; it
would be as far beyond hydrogen fusion as hydrogen fusion is beyond
uranium fission.
And, as a matter of fact, total annihilation of matter is conceivable
under some circumstances.
In 1928 the English physicist Paul Adrien Maurice Dirac (1902- )
presented a treatment of the electron’s properties that made it appear
as though there ought also to exist a particle exactly like the electron
in every respect except that it would be opposite in charge. It would
carry a positive electric charge exactly as large as the electron’s
negative one.
If the electron is a particle, this suggested positively charged twin
would be an “antiparticle”. (The prefix comes from a Greek word meaning
“opposite”.)
[Illustration: _P. A. M. Dirac_]
[Illustration: _The first picture of the positron (left) was taken in a
Wilson cloud chamber. On the right is C. D. Anderson, the discoverer of
the positron._]
The proton is _not_ the electron’s antiparticle. Though a proton carries
the necessary positive charge that is exactly as large as the negative
charge of the electron, the proton has a much larger mass than the
electron has. Dirac’s theory required that the antiparticle have the
same mass as the particle to which it corresponded.
In 1932 C. D. Anderson was studying the impact of cosmic particles on
lead. In the process, he discovered signs of a particle that left tracks
exactly like those of an electron, but tracks that curved the wrong way
in a magnetic field. This was a sure sign that it had an electric charge
opposite to that of the electron. He had, in short, discovered the
electron’s antiparticle and this came to be called the “positron”.
Positrons were soon detected elsewhere too. Some radioactive isotopes,
formed in the laboratory by the Joliot-Curies and by others, were found
to emit positive beta particles—positrons rather than electrons. When an
ordinary beta particle, or electron, was emitted from a nucleus, a
neutron within the nucleus was converted to a proton. When a positive
beta particle, a positron, was emitted, the reverse happened—a proton
was converted to a neutron.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account