Yoga as philosophy and religionDasgupta, Surendranath
Religion
Yoga as philosophy and religion
Dasgupta, Surendranath
Hindu philosophy; Patañjali; Yoga
Now this state is followed by the state of savicārā prajñā, which dawns
when the mind neglecting the grossness of the object sinks deeper and
deeper into its finer constituents; the appearance of the thing in its
grosser aspects drops off and the mind having sunk deep, centres in and
identifies itself with the subtle tanmātras, which are the constituents
of the atoms, as a conglomeration of which the object appeared before
our eyes in the nirvitarka state. Thus when the mind, after identifying
itself with the sun in its true aspect as pure light, tends to settle on
a still finer state of it, either by making the senses so steady that
the outward appearance vanishes, or by seeking finer and finer stages
than the grosser manifestation of light as such, it apprehends the
tanmātric state of the light and knows it as such, and we have what is
called the savicāra stage. It has great similarities with the savitarka
stage, while its differences from that stage spring from the fact that
here the object is the tanmātra and not the gross bhūta. The mind in
this stage holding communion with the rūpa tanmātra, for example, is not
coloured variously as red, blue, etc., as in the savitarka communion
with gross light, for the tanmātric light or light potential has no such
varieties as different kinds of colour, etc., so that there are also no
such different kinds of feeling of pleasure or pain as arise from the
manifold varieties of ordinary light. This is a state of feelingless
representation of one uniform tanmātric state, when the object appears
as a conglomeration of tanmātras of rūpa, rasa or gandha, as the case
might be. This state, however, is not indeterminate, as the nirvitarka
stage, for this tanmātric conception is associated with the notions of
time, space and causality, for the mind here feels that it sees those
tanmātras which are in such a subtle state that they are not associated
with pleasures and pains. They are also endowed with causality in such a
way that from them and their particular collocations originate the
atoms.
It must be noted here that the subtle objects of concentration in this
stage are not the tanmātras alone, but also other subtle substances
including the ego, the buddhi and the prakṛti.
But when the mind acquires the complete habit of this state in which it
becomes identified with these fine objects—the tanmātras—etc., then all
conceptual notions of the associations of time, space, causality, etc.,
spoken of in the savicāra and the savitarka state vanish away and it
becomes one with the fine object of its communion. These two kinds of
prajñā, savicāra and nirvicāra, arising from communion with the fine
tanmātras, have been collocated under one name as vicārānugata. But when
the object of communion is the senses, the samādhi is called
ānandānugata, and when the object of communion is the subtle cause the
ego (_asmitā_), the samādhi is known as asmitānugata.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account