According to the above table (which is copied from a large Mercator’s
chart in the library of the Mechanics’ Institute, Royal Hill,
Greenwich), the distance round the Earth at the Antarctic circle would
only be about 9,000 miles. But practical navigators give the distance
from the Cape of Good Hope to Port Jackson as 8,000 miles; from Port
Jackson to Cape Horn as 8,000 miles; and from Cape Horn to the Cape
of Good Hope, 6,000 miles, making together 22,000 miles. The average
longitude of these places is 45°, at which parallel the circuit of
the Earth, if it be a globe, should only be 14,282 miles. Here, then,
is an error between the theory of rotundity and practical sailing of
7,718 miles. But there are several statements made by Sir James Clarke
Ross which tend to make the disparity even greater: at page 236, vol.
2, of “South Sea Voyages,” it is said “From near Cape Horn to Port
Philip (in Melbourne, Australia) the distance is 9,000 miles.” These
two places are 143 degrees of longitude from each other. Therefore
the whole extent of the Earth’s circumference is a mere arithmetical
question. If 143 degrees make 9,000 miles, what will be the distance
made by the whole 360 degrees into which the surface is divided? The
answer is, 22,657 miles; or, 8,357 miles more than the theory of
rotundity would permit. It must be borne in mind, however, that the
above distances are nautical measure, which, reduced to statute miles,
gives the actual distance round the Southern region at a given latitude
as 26,433 statute miles; or nearly 1,500 miles more than the largest
circumference ever assigned to the Earth at the equator.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account