سَأَلْتُهُ عَنِ امْرَأَةٍ ادَّعَتْ عَلَى زَوْجِهَا أَنَّهُ طَلَّقَهَا تَطْلِيقَةً طَلَاقَ الْعِدَّةِ طَلَاقاً صَحِيحاً يَعْنِي عَلَى طُهْرٍ مِنْ غَيْرِ جِمَاعٍ وَ أَشْهَدَ لَهَا شُهُوداً عَلَى ذَلِكَ ثُمَّ أَنْكَرَ الزَّوْجُ بَعْدَ ذَلِكَ فَقَالَ إِنْ كَانَ إِنْكَارُهُ الطَّلَاقَ قَبْلَ انْقِضَاءِ الْعِدَّةِ فَإِنَّ إِنْكَارَهُ لِلطَّلَاقِ رَجْعَةٌ لَهَا وَ إِنْ كَانَ أَنْكَرَ الطَّلَاقَ بَعْدَ انْقِضَاءِ الْعِدَّةِ فَإِنَّ عَلَى الْإِمَامِ أَنْ يُفَرِّقَ بَيْنَهُمَا بَعْدَ شَهَادَةِ الشُّهُودِ بَعْدَ أَنْ يَسْتَحْلِفَ أَنَّ إِنْكَارَهُ لِلطَّلَاقِ بَعْدَ انْقِضَاءِ الْعِدَّةِ وَ هُوَ خَاطِبٌ مِنَ الْخُطَّابِ .
Translation
Muhammad Bin Yahya, form Ahmad Bin Muhammad, form Ibn Mahboub, from Abu Wallad Al Hannat, (It has been narrated) from Abu Abdullah<sup>asws</sup>, said, ‘I asked him<sup>asws</sup> about a woman who claimed upon her husband, that he had divorced her with a divorce of the waiting period, being a correct divorce, meaning upon purity from without copulating, and witnesses testified for her upon that. Then the husband denied after that. So he<sup>asws</sup> said: ‘If his denial of the divorce was before the fulfillment of the waiting period, so his denial of the divorce, there is reversion to her, and if his denial of the divorce was after the fulfillment of the waiting period, so it is upon the Imam<sup>asws</sup> that he effects separated between them, both after the testimony of the witnesses, after having him swear on oath that his denial of the divorce was after the waiting period, and he would be a proposer from the proposers’.
Compiled by Shaykh Muhammad ibn Ya'qub al-Kulayni
Source
License: Free for educational and research use (Thaqalayn Data API)
Provided for research and educational purposes. Original source: Thaqalayn Project. Open License.