رَجُلٍ ظَاهَرَ ثُمَّ طَلَّقَ قَالَ سَقَطَتْ عَنْهُ الْكَفَّارَةُ إِذَا طَلَّقَ قَبْلَ أَنْ يُعَاوِدَ الْمُجَامَعَةَ قِيلَ فَإِنَّهُ رَاجَعَهَا قَالَ إِنْ كَانَ إِنَّمَا طَلَّقَهَا لِإِسْقَاطِ الْكَفَّارَةِ عَنْهُ ثُمَّ رَاجَعَهَا فَالْكَفَّارَةُ لَازِمَةٌ لَهُ أَبَداً إِذَا عَاوَدَ الْمُجَامَعَةَ وَ إِنْ كَانَ طَلَّقَهَا وَ هُوَ لَا يَنْوِي شَيْئاً مِنْ ذَلِكَ فَلَا بَأْسَ أَنْ يُرَاجِعَ وَ لَا كَفَّارَةَ عَلَيْهِ .
Translation
Abu Ali Al Ashary, from Muhammad Bin Abdul Jabbar, or someone else, from Al Hassan Bin Ali, from Ali Bin Uqba, from Musa Bin Akeyl Al Numeyri, from one of our companions, (It has been narrated) from Abu Abdullah<sup>asws</sup> regarding a man who did <span class="iTxt">Zahaar</span>, then divorced’. He<sup>asws</sup> said: ‘The expiation is dropped off from him when he divorces before he repeats the copulation’. It was said, ‘Supposing he reverts to her?’ He<sup>asws</sup> said: ‘If it was such, rather he divorced her in order for the dropping off of the expiation from him, then he reverted back to her. So the expiation is necessitated for him, ever, whenever he repeats the copulation; and if it was that he divorced her and he did not intend anything from that, so there is no problem if he reverts back to her, and there is no expiation upon him’.
Compiled by Shaykh Muhammad ibn Ya'qub al-Kulayni
Source
License: Free for educational and research use (Thaqalayn Data API)
Provided for research and educational purposes. Original source: Thaqalayn Project. Open License.