سَأَلْتُ أَبَا الْحَسَنِ مُوسَى بْنَ جَعْفَرٍ ( عليه السلام ) قُلْتُ أَشْتَرِي الْجَارِيَةَ فَتَمْكُثُ عِنْدِي الْأَشْهُرَ لَا تَطْمَثُ وَ لَيْسَ ذَلِكَ مِنْ كِبَرٍ وَ أُرِيهَا النِّسَاءَ فَيَقُلْنَ لِي لَيْسَ بِهَا حَبَلٌ فَلِي أَنْ أَنْكِحَهَا فِي فَرْجِهَا فَقَالَ إِنَّ الطَّمْثَ قَدْ تَحْبِسُهُ الرِّيحُ مِنْ غَيْرِ حَبَلٍ فَلَا بَأْسَ أَنْ تَمَسَّهَا فِي الْفَرْجِ قُلْتُ فَإِنْ كَانَ بِهَا حَبَلٌ فَمَا لِي مِنْهَا قَالَ إِنْ أَرَدْتَ فِيمَا دُونَ الْفَرْجِ .
Translation
A number of our companions, from Ahmad Bin Muhammad, from Ibn Mahboub, from Rafa’at Bin Musa Al Nakhhas who said, ‘I asked Abu Al-Hassan Musa<sup>asws</sup> Bin Ja’far<sup>asws</sup> saying, ‘I bought the slave girl, and she remained with me for months not menstruating, and that was not due to old age, and I showed her to the woman, so they said to me, ‘There is no pregnancy with her. So is it for me that I copulate with her in her private part?’ So he<sup>asws</sup> said: ‘The wind could have withheld the menstruation (<span class="iTxt">Haydh</span>) from without a pregnancy, so there is no problem if you touch her in the private part’. I said, ‘Supposing if there was a pregnancy with her, so what would be for me, from her?’ He<sup>asws</sup> said: ‘If you intend so, in what is besides the private part’.
Compiled by Shaykh Muhammad ibn Ya'qub al-Kulayni
Source
License: Free for educational and research use (Thaqalayn Data API)
Provided for research and educational purposes. Original source: Thaqalayn Project. Open License.