لَا يَنْبَغِي لِلرَّجُلِ الْحَلَالِ أَنْ يُزَوِّجَ مُحْرِماً وَ هُوَ يَعْلَمُ أَنَّهُ لَا يَحِلُّ لَهُ قُلْتُ فَإِنْ فَعَلَ فَدَخَلَ بِهَا الْمُحْرِمُ قَالَ إِنْ كَانَا عَالِمَيْنِ فَإِنَّ عَلَى كُلِّ وَاحِدٍ مِنْهُمَا بَدَنَةً وَ عَلَى الْمَرْأَةِ إِنْ كَانَتْ مُحْرِمَةً بَدَنَةً وَ إِنْ لَمْ تَكُنْ مُحْرِمَةً فَلَا شَيْءَ عَلَيْهَا إِلَّا أَنْ تَكُونَ قَدْ عَلِمَتْ أَنَّ الَّذِي تَزَوَّجَهَا مُحْرِمٌ فَإِنْ كَانَتْ عَلِمَتْ ثُمَّ تَزَوَّجَتْهُ فَعَلَيْهَا بَدَنَةٌ .
Translation
A number of our companions, from Ahmad Bin Muhammad, and Sahl Bin Ziyad, from Ibn Mahboub, from Sama’at Bin Mihran, (It has been narrated) from Abu Abdullah<sup>asws</sup> having said: ‘It is not befitting for the man (who is) not in <span class="iTxt">Ihraam</span> that he should marry the one in <span class="iTxt">Ihraam</span>, and he is knowing that it is not Permissible for him’. I said to him<sup>asws</sup>, ‘Supposing he does so and the one in <span class="iTxt">Ihraam</span> sleeps with her?’ He<sup>asws</sup> said: ‘If they were both knowing, so upon each one of them would be a sacrificial animal, and upon the woman, if she was in <span class="iTxt">Ihraam</span>, would be a sacrificial animal, and if she was not in <span class="iTxt">Ihraam</span>, so there would be nothing upon her, except if she happen to have known that the one who married her was in <span class="iTxt">Ihraam</span>. So if she was knowing (of that fact), then got married to him, so upon her would be a sacrificial animal’.
Compiled by Shaykh Muhammad ibn Ya'qub al-Kulayni
Source
License: Free for educational and research use (Thaqalayn Data API)
Provided for research and educational purposes. Original source: Thaqalayn Project. Open License.