Feminism in Greek Literature from Homer to Aristotle
Aristotle · en
To begin with the moral situation in the _Ethics_. Aristotle several
times repeats the statement, common enough in ancient literature, though
it seems now open to serious objection, that women are less temperate and
continent in their desires than men. He does not blame them, but rather
regards them with pity, ‘for a woman is naturally in such matters weaker
than a man: a man’s love is passionate and open; women feel desire and
are cunning.’[1] A line from _The Beguiling of Zeus_ is quoted to support
this view by the authority of Homer, and the philosopher himself agrees
with the common Greek view that for a woman to wish to keep her husband
to herself was a proof that she was both unreasonable and lascivious.
So, in discussing certain morbid habits, such as the practice of biting
one’s nails or eating cinders, Aristotle has the significant remark: ‘Now
whenever nature is the cause of these habits nobody would call people
who give way to them incontinent, any more than we should call women
incontinent from being not males but females.’[2] It is, perhaps, this
belief in the natural incapacity of women for virtue that is the cause
of the depreciatory remarks concerning the essential excellence of an
Athenian woman, ‘bashful modesty.’
It would not be right to speak of a sense of shame as a virtue,
for it is more like an emotion than a moral state: at least
it may be defined as a kind of fear of ignominy, and in its
effects it is analogous to the fear of dangers, for people
blush when they are ashamed and turn pale when they are afraid
of death. It is clear, then, that both affections are in a
sense corporeal, and this seems to be the mark of an emotion
rather than a moral state.[3]
Other slighter defects in the female character, as conceived by
Aristotle, are hinted at in the remark: ‘It is only exceedingly slavish
people who eat and drink beyond the point of surfeit’; and in the
well-known description of the ‘Magnanimous Man,’ Aristotle’s ideal, who,
unlike the shrill-voiced woman,
will have a deep voice and a sedate manner of speaking and be
slow in his movements: he will not be in a hurry or emphatic
in speech, for there are not many things he cares for, nor
does he regard anything as very important, and these are the
causes which make people speak in shrill tones and use rapid
movements.[4]
These are some of the deficiencies in women: we have to go to the
_Rhetoric_ to get Aristotle’s idea of their merits. The passage is
significant:
θηλειῶν δὲ ἀρετή σώματος μὲν κάλλος καὶ μέγεθος, ψύχης δὲ
σωφροσύνη καὶ φιλεργία ἄνευ ἀνελευθερίας.[5]
The excellence of females is (_a_) physical, a large and beautiful body;
(_b_) mental, virtuous moderation and a love—but not a sordid love—of
work.