Præraphaelite diaries and letters — Dante Alighieri — John Shaqi
Præraphaelite diaries and letters
Dante Alighieri · en
Monday 8th.--... Gabriel went to see Millais’s picture, which is
finished. He himself had to work hard at his background all day,
besides doing something to the Virgin’s head; and had Deverell to
assist him in doing certain things. I finished reading Browning’s new
poem, and read it the second time aloud to Deverell.
* * * * *
From 8th April, up to to-day Sunday July 21st, I have neglected the
P.R.B. Journal. My excuse is, plenty else to do--the impelling cause,
idleness. But I hope henceforth to persevere.
Firstly, _The Gurm_[229] died with its fourth No.--leaving us
a legacy of Tupper’s bill--£33 odd, of which the greater part,
I take it, remains still unpaid. Our last gasp was perhaps the
best--containing Orchard’s really wonderful _Dialogue_, Gabriel’s
sonnets on pictures, etc. etc.; with an etching--not very
satisfactory in comparison with the standard of our promise--by
Deverell. Placards were posted and paraded about daily before the
Academy--but to no effect. _The Germ_ was doomed, and succumbed to
its doom.
Millais’s sacred subject, his _Ferdinand and Ariel_, and his
_Portrait of Mr. Drury and his Grandchild_--Hunt’s _Converted British
Family sheltering a Christian Missionary from the Persecution of the
Druids_--and Collinson’s _Answering the Emigrant’s Letter_--went to
the Academy, where they are still exhibiting; Gabriel having at the
last moment elected to send to the National Institution--formerly
Free Exhibition. The “Carpenter’s Shop” of Millais, which has now
become famous as “No. 518,” sold, the morning before sending in,
for £350--Mr. Farrer the picture-dealer being the purchaser. Hunt’s
picture and this are hung half on the line, the portrait on the
line, and the _Ferdinand_ on the ground; Collinson’s, at a height
where all its merits are lost. Millais’s picture has been the signal
for a perfect crusade against the P.R.B. The mystic letters, with
their signification, have appeared in all kinds of papers; first, I
believe, in a letter, _Town Talk and Table Talk_, in the _Illustrated
News_, written by Reach, who must have derived his knowledge, we
conjecture, from Munro.[230] But the designation is now so notorious
that all concealment is at an end. _The Athenæum_ opened with a
savage assault[231] on Gabriel, who answered in a letter which the
editor did not think it expedient to publish; and a conversation
which Millais had with Frank Stone, and in which the latter (speaking
of the picture) introduced several of the observations of _The
Athenæum_, coupled with some other circumstances, make it tolerably
evident that _he_ was the author of that and subsequent critiques.
In noticing Hunt and Millais, nearly a whole page was devoted to
a systematic discussion of (assumed) P.R.B. principles--which F.
S. rather overthrew and demolished than otherwise. In all the
papers--_The Times_, _The Examiner_, _The Daily News_, even to
Dickens’s _Household Words_, where a leader was devoted to the