The Philosophy of Fine Art, volume 4 (of 4): Hegel's Aesthetik
Georg Hegel · en
(_αα_) Under the broadest review of this question we may say that the
conflict of the _belligerent_ condition is that which supplies the
Epos with its most pertinent situation. In war it is obviously the
entire nation which is set in activity, and which, as a whole placed
under similar conditions, is moved and stimulated in a novel way,
in so far at least as it possesses any claim, as such a whole, to
participate in it. We may admit that the above conclusion stands in
apparent contradiction not merely with Homer's Odyssey, but also the
subject-matter of many poems that are epic in an otherwise intelligible
sense. It finds, however, ample corroboration in the majority of the
most famous Epopees. Moreover, the collision of operations in the
events of which the Odyssey informs us, derives part of its source
from the Trojan war; and even under the aspect of domestic life in
Ithaca, no less than that of the home-returning Odysseus, although the
narrative is no actual account of conflicts between Greeks and Trojans,
yet it deals with facts which are the immediate consequence of that
war. Nay, it is itself war under a new aspect, for many chieftains are
forced to reconquer their homes, which after their ten years' absence
they find under wholly altered conditions. We have practically but one
example of the religious Epos, Dante's "Divine Comedy." Even here,
too, the fundamental collision is deducible from that original Fall of
the evil angels from heaven, which brings in its train and within the
sphere of human experience the ever active external and ideal conflict
between the Divine Father and the conduct of men, whether hostile or
well-pleasing to Him, a conflict eternally perpetuated in condemnation,
purification, and blessedness, or in other words, hell, purgatory, and
paradise. Also, too, in the Messias it is the former war against the
Son of God which supplies the focal centre. At the same time the most
vital and truly pertinent examples are those which actually describe
the belligerent state. We have already drawn attention to such in the
Ramajana, and, most instructive of all, in the Iliad; further examples
are the famous poems of Ossian, Tasso, Ariosto, and Camoens. In war
_courage_ is and remains the fundamental interest; and warlike courage
is a state of the soul and an activity, which is neither so suitable
for lyrical expression nor for dramatic action, but is pre-eminently
adapted to the descriptive power of the Epos. In dramatic poetry it is
rather the ideal strength or weakness of spiritual life, the ethically
justified or reprehensible pathos which is the main thing: in the
Epos, on the contrary, it is rather the native characteristics of a
personality. For this reason, where it is national exploits which are
undertaken, bravery is in its right place; it is in fact not an ethical
state,[6] in which the will is determined through its own initiative
as an intelligent consciousness and volition. It rather depends on