The Philosophy of Fine Art, volume 4 (of 4): Hegel's Aesthetik
Georg Hegel · en
(_αα_) In the first place we should draw attention to the possibilities
of _extension_ within the range of the Epos. These are quite as much
due to the form as they are to the content. We have already seen what
a variety of objects may be comprised in the world of the Epic as
fully elaborated, not merely in its ideal capacities, motives, and
aim, but also in respect to its objective situation and environment.
Inasmuch as all these aspects assume an objective form, an appearance
of reality, each one of them takes to itself a form of essentially
independent ideality and externality, in which the epic poet, either
in his exposition or description, is permitted freely to linger, and
to disclose in its positive appearance. The lyric, on the contrary,
concentrates all that it lays hold of within the ideal realm of the
emotions, or refines it away in the generalized vision of reflection.
In the objective world it is the immediate complex in juxtaposition, or
the varied wealth of manifold characteristics, which is presented us.
In this respect we find that in no other type of poetry is the claim
to introduce episodical matter, even to the point of to all appearance
absolute independence, more indisputable than in the Epos. The delight,
however, in actual fact for its own sake and in its natural form must,
as already observed, not be carried so far as to import into the
poem circumstances and facts which have no real connection with the
important action. Such episodes must assert themselves as effective in
the advance of such action, whether as events which are obstructive to
its course, or assistant in their mediation. Yet, despite of this, the
particular portions of the epic poem will be somewhat loosely bound
together. This is a necessary result of the mode of its objectivity.
For in what is objective mediation persists as the ideal essence; what
in contrast to this confronts the external aspect is the independent
existence of particular aspects. This defect in the direction of a
stringent unity and the emphasized relation of specific portions of the
epic poem, which, according to its primitive form, possesses moreover
a primitive period of origination, has this result, that it lends
itself more readily than lyric or dramatic compositions to subsequent
additions and continuations; and, further, it is enabled to appropriate
under its more recent and embracing whole even examples of the saga
which have already received artistic expression of a definite, if not
so exalted character.