The Philosophy of Fine Art, volume 4 (of 4): Hegel's Aesthetik
Georg Hegel · en
In view of the great variety of difference which further separates
particular characters in this type of poetry, it is impossible to do
much in the way of generalization. I will, therefore, restrict myself
to a reference to the following fundamental points of view. A primary
opposition which at once invites notice is that of an _abstract_, and
consequently formal, characterization in its contrast with the actual
individuals whom we are accustomed to meet in the concrete living
world. As example of this type, we may with exceptional pertinency cite
the tragic characters of the French and Italians, which, originating
in the imitation of ancient drama, to a greater or less degree merely
amount to pure personifications of specific passions, such as love,
honour, fame, ambition, tyranny, and so forth, and which, while they
present the motives of their actions, as also the gradation and
quality of their emotions to the best advantage with a lavish display
of declamation, and all the arts of rhetoric, none the less by doing
so rather resemble the dramatic failures of Seneca than the dramatic
masterpieces of the Greeks. Spanish tragedy also receives the stamp
of this abstract style of character-drawing. In this case, however,
the pathos of love, in its conflict with honour, friendship, royal
prerogative, and the rest is itself of so abstract a subjective
character that in the case where the intention is to make this equally
ideal[55] substantiality stand out as the genuine object of interest,
a more complete particularization of characters is hardly feasible.
The characters of Spanish drama, however, often possess a certain kind
of solidity, and, if I may use the expression, inflexible personality,
however wanting in content it may be, a feature that is absent from
French work; and at the same time Spanish writers, here also in
contrast to the cold simplicity which the movement of French tragedies
exhibits even in their tragic composition, know how to make up with the
cleverly invented abundance of interesting situations and developments
the deficiency referred to in the matter of characterization.