The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 01 (of 11)
Thomas Hobbes · en
Let A B (in fig. 1) represent a vessel, such as gardeners use to water
their gardens withal; whose bottom B is full of little holes; and whose
mouth A may be stopped with one's finger, when there shall be need. If
now this vessel be filled with water, the hole at the top A being
stopped, the water will not flow out at any of the holes in the bottom
B. But if the finger be removed to let in the air above, it will run out
at them all; and as; soon as the finger is applied to it again, the
water will suddenly and totally be stayed again from running out. The
cause whereof seems to be no other but this, that the water cannot by
its natural endeavour to descend drive down the air below it, because
there is no place for it to go into, unless either by thrusting away the
next contiguous air, it proceed by continual endeavour to the hole A,
where it may enter and succeed into the place of the water that floweth
out, or else, by resisting the endeavour of the water downwards,
penetrate the same and pass up through it. By the first of these ways,
while the hole at A remains stopped, there is no possible passage; nor
by the second, unless the holes be so great that the water, flowing out
at them, can by its own weight force the air at the same time to ascend
into the vessel by the same holes: as we see it does in a vessel whose
mouth is wide enough, when we turn suddenly the bottom upwards to pour
out the water; for then the air being forced by the weight of the water,
enters, as is evident by the sobbing and resistance of the water, at the
sides or circumference of the orifice. And this I take for a sign that
all space is full; for without this, the natural motion of the water,
which is a heavy body, downwards, would not be hindered.
[Sidenote: The arguments of Lucretius for vacuum invalid.]
3. On the contrary, for the establishing of vacuum, many and specious
arguments and experiments have been brought. Nevertheless there seems to
be something wanting in all of them to conclude it firmly. These
arguments for vacuum are partly made by the followers of the doctrine of
Epicurus; who taught that the world consists of very small spaces not
filled by any body, and of very small bodies that have within them no
empty space, which by reason of their hardness he calls _atoms_; and
that these small bodies and spaces are every where intermingled. Their
arguments are thus delivered by Lucretius.