The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 01 (of 11) — Thomas Hobbes — John Shaqi
The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 01 (of 11)
Thomas Hobbes · en
From this phenomenon, they argue for the necessity of vacuum in this
manner. The bottle, from the beginning, was full of air; which air could
neither go out by penetrating so great a length of water as was injected
by the pipe, nor by any other way. Of necessity, therefore, all the
water as high as F G, as also all the air that was in the bottle before
the water was forced in, must now be in the same place, which at first
was filled by the air alone; which were impossible, if all the space
within the bottle were formerly filled with air precisely, that is,
without any vacuum. Besides, though some man perhaps may think the air,
being a thin body, may pass through the body of the water contained in
the pipe, yet from that other phenomenon, namely, that all the water
which is in the space B F G is cast out again by the spout at E, for
which it seems impossible that any other reason can be given besides the
force by which the air frees itself from compression, it follows, that
either there was in the bottle some space empty, or that many bodies may
be together in the same place. But this last is absurd; and therefore
the former is true, namely, that there was vacuum.
This argument is infirm in two places. For first, that is assumed which
is not to be granted; and in the second place, an experiment is brought,
which I think is repugnant to vacuum. That which is assumed is, that the
air can have no passage out through the pipe. Nevertheless, we see daily
that air easily ascends from the bottom to the superficies of a river,
as is manifest by the bubbles that rise; nor doth it need any other
cause to give it this motion, than the natural endeavour downwards of
the water. Why, therefore, may not the endeavour upwards of the same
water, acquired by the injection, which endeavour upwards is greater
than the natural endeavour of the water downwards, cause the air in the
bottle to penetrate in like manner the water that presseth it downwards;
especially, seeing the water, as it riseth in the bottle, doth so press
the air that is above it, as that it generateth in every part thereof an
endeavour towards the external superficies of the pipe, and consequently
maketh all the parts of the enclosed air to tend directly towards the
passage at B? I say, this is no less manifest, than that the air which
riseth up from the bottom of a river should penetrate the water, how
deep soever it be. Wherefore I do not yet see any cause why the force,
by which the water is injected, should not at the same time eject the
air.