The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 05 (of 11)
Thomas Hobbes · en
_T. H._ The fourth opinion which he rejecteth, is of them that make the
will necessarily to follow the last dictate of the understanding; but it
seems he understands that tenet in another sense than I do. For he
speaketh as if they that held it, did suppose men must dispute the
sequel of every action they do, great and small, to the least grain;
which is a thing that he thinks with reason to be untrue. But I
understand it to signify, that the will follows the last opinion or
judgment, immediately preceding the action, concerning whether it be
good to do it or not; whether he hath weighed it long before, or not at
all. And that I take to be the meaning of them that hold it. As for
example: when a man strikes, his will to strike follows necessarily that
thought he had of the sequel of his stroke, immediately before the
lifting of his hand. Now if it be understood in that sense, the last
dictate of the understanding does certainly necessitate the action,
though not as the whole cause, yet as the last cause: as the last
feather necessitates the breaking of a horse’s back, when there are so
many laid on before, as there needeth but the addition of that one to
make the weight sufficient. That which he allegeth against this, is
first, out of a poet, who in the person of Medea says, _video meliora
proboque, deteriora sequor_. But the saying, as pretty as it is, is not
true. For though Medea saw many reasons to forbear killing her children,
yet the last dictate of her judgment was that the present revenge on her
husband outweighed them all; and thereupon the wicked action followed
necessarily. Then the story of the Roman, that of two competitors said
one had the better reasons, but the other must have the office: this
also maketh against him. For the last dictate of his judgment that had
the bestowing of the office, was this; that it was better to take a
great bribe, than reward a great merit. Thirdly, he objects, that things
nearer the senses move more powerfully than reason. What followeth
thence but this; that the sense of the present good is commonly more
immediate to the action, than the foresight of the evil consequents to
come? Fourthly, whereas he says, that do what a man can, he shall sorrow
more for the death of his son, than for the sin of his soul: it makes
nothing to the last dictate of the understanding; but it argues plainly,
that sorrow for sin is not voluntary. And by consequence, repentance
proceedeth from causes.