The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 05 (of 11)
Thomas Hobbes · en
table, a desk, and leisure, the art of writing, and the free use of his
hand, hath all things requisite to write if he will; and yet he may
forbear if he will. Or as he that hath men, and money, and arms, and
munition, and ships, and a just cause, hath all things requisite for
war; yet he may make peace if he will. Or as the king proclaimed in the
gospel (Matth. xxii. 4): _I have prepared my dinner, my oxen and my
fatlings are killed, all things are ready; come unto the marriage_.
According to T. H.’s doctrine, the guests might have told him that he
said not truly, for their own wills were not ready. (_b_) And indeed if
the will were (as he conceives it is) necessitated extrinsically to
every act of willing, if it had no power to forbear willing what it doth
will, nor to will what it doth not will; then if the will were wanting,
something requisite to the producing of the effect was wanting. But now
when science and conscience, reason and religion, our own and other
men’s experience doth teach us, that the will hath a dominion over its
own acts to will or nill without extrinsical necessitation, if the power
to will be present _in actu primo_, determinable by ourselves, then
there is no necessary power wanting in this respect to the producing of
the effect.
“Secondly, these words, ‘to act or not to act, to work or not to work,
to produce or not to produce’, have reference to the effect, not as a
thing which is already done or doing, but as a thing to be done. They
imply not the actual production, but the producibility of the effect.
But when once the will hath actually concurred with all other causes and
conditions and circumstances, then the effect is no more possible nor
producible, but it is in being, and actually produced. Thus he takes
away the subject of the question. The question is, whether effects
producible be free from necessity. He shuffles out ‘effects producible’,
and thrusts in their places ‘effects produced’, or which are in the act
of production. Wherefore I conclude, that it is neither nonsense nor
contradiction to say that a free agent, when all things requisite to
produce the effect are present, may nevertheless not produce it.
ANIMADVERSIONS UPON THE ANSWER TO NO. XXXII.