The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 05 (of 11)
Thomas Hobbes · en
place wherein I have done so.
NO. XXXIII.
_T. H._ For my first five points; where it is explicated, first, what
spontaneity is; secondly, what deliberation is; thirdly, what will,
propension, and appetite is; fourthly, what a free agent is; fifthly,
what liberty is: there can be no other proof offered but every man’s own
experience, by reflecting on himself, and remembering what he useth to
have in his mind, that is, what he himself meaneth, when he saith, an
action is spontaneous, a man deliberates, such is his will, that agent
or that action is free. Now, he that so reflecteth on himself, cannot
but be satisfied, that _deliberation_ is the considering of the good and
evil sequels of the action to come; that by _spontaneity_ is meant
inconsiderate proceeding; for else nothing is meant by it; that _will_
is the last act of our deliberation; that a _free agent_, is he that can
do if he will and forbear if he will; and that _liberty_ is the absence
of external impediments. But to those that out of custom speak not what
they conceive, but what they hear, and are not able or will not take the
pains to consider what they think, when they hear such words, no
argument can be sufficient; because experience and matter of fact is not
verified by other men’s arguments, but by every man’s own sense and
memory. For example, how can it be proved, that to love a thing and to
think it good are all one, to a man that does not mark his own meaning
by those words? Or how can it be proved that eternity is not _nunc
stans_, to a man that says these words by custom, and never considers
how he can conceive the thing itself in his mind? Also the sixth point,
that a man cannot imagine any thing to begin without a cause, can no
other way be made known but by trying how he can imagine it. But if he
try, he shall find as much reason, if there be no cause of the thing, to
conceive it should begin at one time as another, that is, he hath equal
reason to think it should begin at all times, which is impossible. And
therefore he must think there was some special cause, why it began then
rather than sooner or later; or else, that it began never, but was
eternal.
[Sidenote: The Bishop’s reply.]