The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 06 (of 11)
Thomas Hobbes · en
_B._ He were in an ill case then, that adventured to write or speak in
defence of the civil power, that must be punished by him whose rights he
defended, like Uzza, that was slain because he would needs, unbidden,
put forth his hand to keep the ark from falling. But if a whole nation
should revolt from the Pope at once, what effect could excommunication
have upon the nation?
_A._ Why, they should have no more mass said, at least by any of the
Pope’s priests. Besides, the Pope would have no more to do with them,
but cast them off, and so they would be in the same case as if a nation
should be cast off by their king, and left to be governed by themselves,
or whom they would.
_B._ This would not be taken so much for a punishment to the people, as
to the King; and therefore when a Pope excommunicates a whole nation,
methinks he rather excommunicates himself than them. But I pray you tell
me, what were the rights that the Pope pretended to in the kingdoms of
other princes?
_A._ First, an exemption of all priests, friars, and monks, in criminal
causes, from the cognizance of civil judges. Secondly, collation of
benefices on whom he pleased, native or stranger, and exaction of
tenths, first fruits, and other payments. Thirdly, appeals to Rome in
all causes where the Church could pretend to be concerned. Fourthly, to
be the supreme judge concerning lawfulness of marriage, that is
concerning the hereditary succession of Kings, and to have the
cognizance of all causes concerning adultery and fornication.
_B._ Good! A monopoly of women.
_A._ Fifthly, a power of absolving subjects of their duties, and of
their oaths of fidelity to their lawful sovereigns, when the Pope should
think fit for the extirpation of heresy.
_B._ This power of absolving subjects of their obedience, as also that
other of being judge of manners and doctrine, is as absolute a
sovereignty as is possible to be; and consequently there must be two
kingdoms in one and the same nation, and no man be able to know which of
his masters he must obey.
_A._ For my part, I should rather obey that master that had the right of
making laws and of inflicting punishments, than him that pretendeth only
to a right of making canons, that is to say, rules, and no right of
co-action, or otherwise punishing, but by excommunication.
_B._ But the Pope pretends also that his canons are laws; and for
punishing, can there be greater than excommunication; supposing it true,
as the Pope saith it is, that he that dies excommunicate is damned?
Which supposition, it seems, you believe not; else you would rather have
chosen to obey the Pope, that would cast your body and soul into hell,
than the King, that can only kill the body.
_A._ You say true. For it were very uncharitable in me to believe that
all Englishmen, except a few Papists, that have been born and called
heretics ever since the Reformation of Religion in England, should be
damned.