The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 06 (of 11)
Thomas Hobbes · en
_B._ It seems therefore, if there arise any new error that hath not yet
been declared heresy, (and many such may arise), it cannot be judged
heresy without a Parliament. For how foul soever the error be, it cannot
have been declared heresy neither in the Scriptures nor in the Councils;
because it was never before heard of. And consequently there can be no
error, unless it fall within the compass of blasphemy against God or
treason against the King, for which a man can in equity be punished.
Besides, who can tell what is declared by the Scripture, which every man
is allowed to read and interpret to himself? Nay more, what Protestant,
either of the laity or clergy, if every general Council can be a
competent judge of heresy, is not already condemned? For divers Councils
have declared a great many of our doctrines to be heresy, and that, as
they pretend, upon the authority of the Scriptures.
_A._ What are those points, that the first four general Councils have
declared heresy?
_B._ The first general Council, held at Nicæa, declared all to be heresy
which was contrary to the Nicene Creed, upon occasion of the heresy of
Arius, which was the denying the divinity of Christ. The second general
Council, held at Constantinople, declared heresy the doctrine of
Macedonius; which was that the Holy Ghost was created. The third
Council, assembled at Ephesus, condemned the doctrine of Nestorius, that
there were two persons in Christ. The fourth, held at Chalcedon,
condemned the error of Eutyches, that there was but one nature in
Christ. I know of no other points condemned in these four Councils, but
such as concern church-government, or the same doctrines taught by other
men in other words. And these Councils were all called by the Emperors,
and by them their decrees confirmed at the petition of the Councils
themselves.
_A._ I see by this, that both the calling of the Council, and the
confirmation of their doctrine and church-government, had no obligatory
force but from the authority of the Emperor. How comes it then to pass,
that they take upon them now a legislative power, and say their canons
are laws? That text, _all power is given to me in heaven and earth_, had
the same force then as it hath now, and conferred a legislative power on
the Councils, not only over Christian men, but over all nations in the
world.
_B._ They say no; for the power they pretend to is derived from this,
that when a king was converted from Gentilism to Christianity, he did by
that very submission to the bishop that converted him, submit to the
bishop’s government and became one of his sheep; which right therefore
he could not have over any nation that was not Christian.
_A._ Did Sylvester, which was Pope of Rome in the time of Constantine
the Great, converted by him, tell the Emperor, his new disciple,
beforehand, that if he became a Christian he must be the Pope’s subject?