The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 06 (of 11) — Thomas Hobbes — John Shaqi
The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 06 (of 11)
Thomas Hobbes · en
The other piece is a discourse concerning the laws of England, and has
been finished many years. Herein he has endeavoured to accommodate the
general notions of his politic to the particular constitution of the
English monarchy: a design of no small difficulty; wherein to have
succeeded deserves much honour; to have perchance miscarried, deserves
easy pardon. It has had the good fortune to be much esteemed by the
greatest men of the profession of the law, and therefore may be presumed
to contain somewhat excellent. However it is not to be expected that all
men should submit to his opinions, yet it is hoped none will be offended
at the present publishing of these papers; since they will not find here
any new fantastic notions, but only such things as have been already
asserted with strength of argument by himself and other persons of
eminent learning. To the public at least this benefit may accrue, that
some able pen may undertake the controversy, being moved with the desire
of that reputation which will necessarily attend victory over so
considerable an adversary.
THE
WHOLE ART OF RHETORIC.
BOOK I.
CHAPTER I.
THAT RHETORIC IS AN ART CONSISTING NOT ONLY IN MOVING THE PASSIONS OF
THE JUDGE, BUT CHIEFLY IN PROOFS: AND THAT THIS ART IS PROFITABLE.
We see that all men naturally are able in some sort to _accuse_ and
_excuse_: some by chance; but some by method. This method may be
discovered; and to discover method is all one with teaching an art. If
this art consisted in criminations only, and the skill to stir up the
judge’s anger, envy, fear, pity, or other affections; a rhetorician in
well ordered commonwealths and states, where it is forbidden to digress
from the cause in hearing, could have nothing at all to say. For all
these perversions of the judge are beside the question. And that which
the pleader is to shew, and the judge to give sentence on, is this only:
_It is so_, or _not so_. The rest hath been decided already by the
law-maker; who judging of universals and future things, could not be
corrupted. Besides, it is an absurd thing for a man to make crooked the
ruler he means to use.