The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, Volume 06 (of 11)
Thomas Hobbes · en
_L._ The King may do so, if he please: and Sir Edward Coke tells you how
he altered particular judgments in case of felony, and showeth that
judgment being given upon a lord in Parliament, that he should be
hanged, he was nevertheless beheaded; and that another lord had the like
judgment for another felony, and was not hanged but beheaded: and withal
he shows you the inconveniency of such proceeding, because, saith he, if
hanging might be altered to beheading, by the same reason it might be
altered to burning, stoning to death, &c.
_P._ Perhaps there might be inconveniency in it; but it is more than I
see, or he shows, nor did there happen any inconveniency from the
execution he citeth: besides he granteth, that death, being _ultimum
supplicium_, is a satisfaction to the law. But what is all this to the
purpose, when it belongeth not to consider such inconveniences of
government but to the King and Parliament? Or who, from the authority of
a deputed judge, can derive a power to censure the actions of a King
that hath deputed him?
_L._ For the death of a man by misfortune, there is, he saith, no
express judgment, nor for killing a man in one’s own defence; but he
saith, that the law hath in both cases given judgment that he, that so
killeth a man, shall forfeit all his goods and chattels, debts and
duties.
_P._ If we consider what Sir Edward Coke saith (1 _Inst._ _sec._ 745),
at the word _felony_, these judgments are very favourable; for there he
saith, that killing a man by _chance medley_, or _se defendendo_, is
_felony_. His words are: “wherefore by the law at this day, under the
word _felony_ in commissions, &c. is included petite treason, murder,
homicide, burning of houses, burglary, robbery, rape, &c.
_chance-medley_, and _se defendendo_.” But if we consider only the
intent of him that killeth a man by misfortune or in his own defence,
the same judgments will be thought both cruel and sinful judgments. And
how they can be _felony_, at this day cannot be understood, unless there
be a statute to make them so. For the statute of 25 _Hen. III_, _c._ 25,
the words whereof, “murder from henceforth shall not be judged before
our justices, where it is found misfortune only, but it shall take place
in such as are slain by felony, and not otherwise,” make it manifest, if
they be felonies, they must also be murders, unless they have been made
felonies by some later statute.
_L._ There is no such later statute, nor is it to say in commission; nor
can a commission, or anything but another statute, make a thing felony
that was not so before.