Philosophumena; or, The refutation of all heresies, Volume I — David Hume — John Shaqi
Philosophumena; or, The refutation of all heresies, Volume I
David Hume · en
judgment fire, and the unillumined vision of gloomy Tartarus, and the
burning of the everlasting shore of the Gehenna of fire, and the eye of
the Tartaruchian angels in eternal punishment, and the worm that ever
coils as if for food round the body whence it was bred,[74]--or, as he
might have said in one word, the horrors of hell.
Less distinctive than this, although equally noticeable, is the play
of words which is here frequently employed. This is not unknown among
other ecclesiastical writers of the time, and seems to have struck
Charles Kingsley when, fresh from a perusal of St. Augustine, he
describes him as “by a sheer mistranslation” twisting one of the Psalms
to mean what it never meant in the writer’s mind, and what it never
could mean, and then punning on the Latin version.[75] Hippolytus
when writing in his own person makes but moderate use of this figure.
Sometimes he does so legitimately enough, as when he speaks of the
Gnostics initiating a convert into their systems and delivering to him
“the perfection of wickedness”--the word used for perfection having the
mystic or technical meaning of initiation as well as the more ordinary
one of completion[76]; or when he says that the measurements of stellar
distances by Ptolemy have led to the construction of measureless
“heresies.”[77] At others he consciously puns on the double meaning of
a word, as when he says that those who venture upon orgies are not far
from the wrath (ὀργή) of God.[78] Sometimes, again, he is led away by
a merely accidental similarity of sounds as when he tries to connect
the name of the Docetæ, which he knows is taken from δοκεῖν, “to seem,”
with “the _beam_ (δοκός) in the eye” of the Sermon on the Mount.[79] He
makes a second and more obvious pun on the same word later when he says
that the Docetæ do more than _seem_ to be mad; but he is most shameless
when he derives “prophet” from προφαίνειν instead of πρόφημι[80]--a
perversion which one can hardly imagine entering into the head of any
one with the most modest acquaintance with Greek grammar.