Philosophumena; or, The refutation of all heresies, Volume II
David Hume · en
[Footnote 124: Like the Egyptian _turria_, an axe with its blade at
right angles to instead of in a line with the shaft. Much used for
digging.]
[Footnote 125: This section also is taken from Josephus, _op. cit._,
II, 8, 9. Hippolytus omits to say that the blasphemers of Moses were to
be punished capitally. The refusal to get out of bed is not mentioned
by Josephus.]
[Footnote 126: τὴν ἄσκησιν, lit., “training,” as for a gymnastic
competition. Cf. our word “ascetic.”]
[Footnote 127: Josephus, _op. cit._, § 10, says that the sect and not
their teaching was fourfold. He transfers the story of pollution by
touch to the attitude of the seniors towards the juniors, and knows
nothing of the gate story. The Zealots, according to him (_op. cit._,
VII, 8, 1) grew up under the Sicarii, who defended Masada against the
Romans in Vespasian’s time. The rest of this section corresponds with
his Book II, 8, 10.]
[Footnote 128: In this section, Hippolytus leaves Josephus, except as
to the Islands of the Blessed and the Essene gift of prophecy, both of
which are to be found in Josephus, _op. cit._, II, 8, 11, 12.]
[Footnote 129: Josephus (_op. cit._, II, 8, 13), almost _verbatim_
through the whole section.]
[Footnote 130: ὀνόμασι κυρίοις, properly “nicknames.” He seems to
imply that while they called themselves Jews, other people knew them
as Pharisees, Chasidim, or Puritans. The statement about Fate and the
everlasting punishment of the wicked is to be found in Josephus (_op.
cit._, II, 8, 14), but the reward of the good is there said to be
metempsychosis.]
[Footnote 131: This section also appears to be expanded from Josephus,
_op. cit._, II, 8, 14.]
[Footnote 132: ἱερουργική.]
[Footnote 133: He here seems to imply that in the view of the Jews, at
any rate, the All was made from pre-existent material, as a house from
bricks, while some things were created _e nihilo_. This is denied in
the next sentence.]
[Footnote 134: ἄψυχον. Perhaps with Cruice and Macmahon, we should
translate “without _life_.” Yet it seems hardly possible that Jews
considered stones and minerals as alive.]
[Footnote 135: Leviticus?]
[Footnote 136: Here he, or perhaps some commentator, has to contradict
what he has just said about “all” Jews believing these doctrines.]
[Footnote 137: βασιλεῦον καὶ ἱερατεῦον, “acting as kings and priests.”]
[Footnote 138: Here again it is plain that “all Jews” could not believe
this statement of Messianic hopes, and the Sadducees in particular
would have repudiated what he says about the Resurrection and future
recompense.]
[Footnote 139: τῶν φιλοσοφουμένων, a play quite in Hippolytus’ usual
manner on the name of the Book and its meaning. It should be noted that
the “things imagined by the heretics” correspond to the second title,
“Refutation of all Heresies.”]