The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol. I., Part B.: From Henry III. to Richard III. — David Hume — John Shaqi
The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol. I., Part B.: From Henry III. to Richard III.
David Hume · en
thinned around him: the nobles fell by his side one after another:
his son, scarce fourteen years of age, received a wound, while he was
fighting valiantly in defence of his father: the king himself, spent
with fatigue and overwhelmed by numbers, might easily have been slain;
but every English gentleman, ambitious of taking alive the royal
prisoner, spared him in the action, exhorted him to surrender, and
offered him quarter: several, who attempted to seize him, suffered for
their temerity. He still cried out, “Where is my cousin, the prince
of Wales?” and seemed unwilling to become prisoner to any person of
inferior rank. But being told that the prince was at a distance on the
field, he threw down his gauntlet, and yielded himself to Dennis de
Morbec, a knight of Arras, who had been obliged to fly his country for
murder. His son was taken with him.[*]
* Rymer, vol vi. p. 72, 154. Froissard, liv. i. chap. 164.
The prince of Wales, who had been carried away in pursuit of the flying
enemy, finding the field entirely clear, had ordered a tent to be
pitched, and was reposing himself after the toils of battle; inquiring
still with great anxiety concerning the fate of the French monarch.
He despatched the earl of Warwick to bring him intelligence; and that
nobleman came happily in time to save the life of the captive prince
which was exposed to greater danger than it had been during the heat
of the action. The English had taken him by violence from Morbec: the
Gascons claimed the honor of detaining the royal prisoner; and some
brutal soldiers, rather than yield the prize to their rivals, had
threatened to put him to death.[*] Warwick overawed both parties, and
approaching the king with great demonstrations of respect, offered to
conduct him to the prince’s tent.
Here commences the real and truly admirable heroism of Edward; for
victories are vulgar things in comparison of that moderation and
humanity displayed by a young prince of twenty-seven years of age, not
yet cooled from the fury of battle, and elated by as extraordinary and
as unexpected success as had ever crowned the arms of any commander.
He came forth to meet the captive king with all the marks of regard and
sympathy; administered comfort to him amidst his misfortunes; paid him
the tribute of praise due to his valor; and ascribed his own victory
merely to the blind chance of war, or to a superior providence, which
controls all the efforts of human force and prudence.[**] The behavior
of John showed him not unworthy of this courteous treatment; his present
abject fortune never made him forget a moment that he was a king: more
touched by Edward’s generosity than by his own calamities, he confessed
that, notwithstanding his defeat and captivity, his honor was still
unimpaired; and that if he yielded the victory, it was at least gained
by a prince of such consummate valor and humanity.
* Froissard, liv. i. chap. 164.
** Poul. Cemil, p. 197.