The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol. I., Part C.: From Henry VII. to Mary
David Hume · en
The arguments employed by the French party, being seconded by the
natural prejudices of the people, seemed most prevalent: and when the
regent himself, who had been long detained beyond his appointed time by
the danger from the English fleet, at last appeared among them, he was
able to throw the balance entirely on that side. By authority of the
convention of states, he assembled an army, with a view of avenging the
ravages committed by the English in the beginning of the campaign; and
he led them southwards towards the borders. But when they were passing
the Tweed at the bridge of Melross, the English party raised again such
opposition, that Albany thought proper to make a retreat. He marched
downwards, along the banks of the Tweed, keeping that river on his
right; and fixed his camp opposite to Werkcastle, which Surrey had
lately repaired. He sent over some troops to besiege this fortress, who
made a breach in it, and stormed some of the outworks: but the regent,
hearing of the approach of an English army, and discouraged by the
advanced season, thought proper to disband his forces and retire to
Edinburgh. Soon after, he went over to France, and never again returned
to Scotland. The Scottish nation, agitated by their domestic factions,
were not, during several years, in a condition to give any more
disturbance to England; and Henry had full leisure to prosecute his
designs on the continent.
The reason why the war against France proceeded so slowly on the part
of England, was the want of money. All the treasures of Henry VII. were
long ago dissipated; the king’s habits of expense still remained; and
his revenues were unequal even to the ordinary charge of government,
much more to his military enterprises. He had last year caused a general
survey to be made of the kingdom; the numbers of men, their years,
profession, stock, revenue;[*] and expressed great satisfaction on
finding the nation so opulent. He then issued privy seals to the most
wealthy, demanding loans of particular sums: this act of power, though
somewhat irregular and tyrannical, had been formerly practised by kings
of England; and the people were now familiarized to it. But Henry, this
year, carried his authority much further. He published an edict for
a general tax upon his subjects, which he still called a loan; and he
levied five shillings in the pound upon the clergy, two shillings upon
the laity. This pretended loan, as being more regular, was really more
dangerous to the liberties of the people, and was a precedent for the
king’s imposing taxes without consent of parliament.
* Herbert. Stowe, p. 514.