The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol. I., Part D.: From Elizabeth to James I. — David Hume — John Shaqi
The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol. I., Part D.: From Elizabeth to James I.
David Hume · en
This concession, which Mary could scarcely avoid without an
acknowledgment of guilt, was the point expected and desired by
Elizabeth: she immediately despatched Midlemore to the regent of
Scotland; requiring him both to desist from the further prosecution of
his queen’s party, and to send some persons to London to justify his
conduct with regard to her. Murray might justly be startled at receiving
a message so violent and imperious; but as his domestic enemies were
numerous and powerful, and England was the sole ally which he could
expect among foreign nations, he was resolved rather to digest the
affront, than provoke Elizabeth by a refusal. He also considered, that
though that queen had hitherto appeared partial to Mary, many political
motives evidently engaged her to support the king’s cause in Scotland;
and it was not to be doubted but so penetrating a princess would in the
end discover this interest, and would at least afford him a patient and
equitable hearing. He therefore replied, that he would himself take a
journey to England, attended by other commissioners, and would willingly
submit the determination of his cause to Elizabeth.[**]
Lord Herreis now perceived that his mistress had advanced too far in
her concessions: he endeavored to maintain, that Mary could not, without
diminution of her royal dignity, submit to a contest with her rebellious
subjects before a foreign prince: and he required either present aid
from England, or liberty for his queen to pass over into France. Being
pressed, however, with the former agreement before the English council,
he again renewed his consent; but in a few days he began anew to recoil;
and it was with some difficulty that he was brought to acquiesce in the
first determination.[***] These fluctuations, which were incessantly
renewed, showed his visible reluctance to the measures pursued by the
court of England.
* Anderson, vol. iv. p. 10, 55, 87.
** Anderson, vol. iv. p. 13-16.
*** Anderson, vol. iv. p. 16-20.