The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol. I., Part D.: From Elizabeth to James I. — David Hume — John Shaqi
The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol. I., Part D.: From Elizabeth to James I.
David Hume · en
The queen of Scots discovered no less aversion to the trial proposed;
and it required all the artifice and prudence of Elizabeth to make her
persevere in the agreement to which she had at first consented. This
latter princess still said to her, that she desired not without Mary’s
consent and approbation to enter into the question, and pretended only
as a friend to hear her justification: that she was confident there
would be found no difficulty in refuting all the calumnies of her
enemies; and even if her apology should fall short of full conviction,
Elizabeth was determined to support her cause, and procure her some
reasonable terms of accommodation; and that it was never meant, that she
should be cited to a trial on the accusation of her rebellious subjects;
but, on the contrary, that they should be summoned to appear, and to
justify themselves for their conduct towards her.[*] Allured by these
plausible professions, the queen of Scots agreed to vindicate herself by
her own commissioners, before commissioners appointed by Elizabeth.
During these transactions, Lord Scrope and Sir Francis Knolles, who
resided with Mary at Carlisle, had leisure to study her character, and
to make report of it to Elizabeth. Unbroken by her misfortunes, resolute
in her purpose, active in her enterprises, she aspired to nothing but
victory; and was determined to endure any extremity, to undergo any
difficulty, and to try every fortune, rather than abandon her cause, or
yield the superiority to her enemies. Eloquent, insinuating, affable,
she had already convinced all those who approached her, of the innocence
of her past conduct; and as she declared her fixed purpose to require
aid of her friends all over Europe, and even to have recourse to
infidels and barbarians, rather than fail of vengeance against her
persecutors, it was easy to foresee the danger to which her charms, her
spirit, her address, if allowed to operate with their full force, would
expose them.[**] The court of England, therefore, who, under pretence
of guarding her, had already in effect detained her prisoner, were
determined to watch her with still greater vigilance. As Carlisle,
by its situation on the borders, afforded her great opportunities
of contriving her escape, they removed her to Bolton, a seat of Lord
Scrope’s in Yorkshire; and the issue of the controversy between her
and the Scottish nation was regarded as a subject more momentous
to Elizabeth’s security and interests than it had hitherto been
apprehended.
* Anderson, vol. iv. p. 11, 12, 13, 109, 110.
** Anderson, vol. iv. p. 54, 71, 72, 74, 78, 92.