The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol. I., Part D.: From Elizabeth to James I. — David Hume — John Shaqi
The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol. I., Part D.: From Elizabeth to James I.
David Hume · en
He had ever been a partisan of the queen of Scots. Secretary Lidington,
who began also to incline to that party, and was a man of singular
address and capacity, had engaged him to embrace further views in
her favor, and even to think of espousing her: and though that duke
confessed[*] that the proofs against Mary seemed to him unquestionable,
he encouraged Murray in his present resolution, not to produce them
publicly in the conferences before the English commissioners.[**]
Norfolk, however, was obliged to transmit to court the queries proposed
by the regent. These queries consisted of four particulars: Whether the
English commissioners had authority from their sovereign to pronounce
sentence against Mary, in case her guilt should be fully proved before
them? Whether they would promise to exercise that authority, and proceed
to an actual sentence? Whether the queen of Scots, if she were found
guilty, should be delivered into the hands of the regent, or, at least,
be so secured in England, that she never should be able to disturb the
tranquillity of Scotland? and, Whether Elizabeth would also, in that
case, promise to acknowledge the young king, and protect the regent in
his authority?[***]
Elizabeth, when these queries, with the other transactions, were laid
before her, began to think that they pointed towards a conclusion more
decisive and more advantageous than she had hitherto expected. She
determined therefore to bring the matter into full light; and, under
pretext that the distance from her person retarded the proceedings
of her commissioners, she ordered them to come to London, and there
continue the conferences. On their appearance, she immediately joined in
commission with them some of the most considerable of her council; Sir
Nicholas Bacon, lord keeper, the earls of Arundel and Leicester, Lord
Clinton, admiral, and Sir William Cecil, secretary.[****] The queen of
Scots, who knew nothing of these secret motives, and who expected that
fear or decency would still restrain Murray from proceeding to any
violent accusation against her, expressed an entire satisfaction in this
adjournment; and declared that the affair, being under the immediate
inspection of Elizabeth, was now in the hands where she most desired to
rest it.[v].
* Anderson, vol., iv. part ii. p. 77.
** Anderson, vol. iv. part ii. p. 57, 77. State Trials, vol.
i. p. 76
*** Anderson, vol. iv. part ii. p. 55. Goodall, vol. ii. p.
130.
**** Anderson, vol. iv. part ii. p. 99.
v Anderson, vol iv. part ii. p. 95. Goodall, vol. ii. p
177, 179.
The conferences were accordingly continued at Hampton Court; and Mary’s
commissioners, as before, made no scruple to be present at them.