The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol. I., Part D.: From Elizabeth to James I. — David Hume — John Shaqi
The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol. I., Part D.: From Elizabeth to James I.
David Hume · en
The queen’s answer to this apology was obvious: that she did not know,
and never could suspect, that Bothwell, who had been acquitted by a
jury, and recommended to her by all the nobility for her husband,
was the murderer of the king; that she ever was, and still continues
desirous, that, if he be guilty, he may be brought to condign
punishment; that her resignation of the crown was extorted from her
by the well-grounded fears of her life, and even by direct menaces
of violence; and that Throgmorton, the English ambassador, as well as
others of her friends, had advised her to sign that paper, as the only
means of saving herself from the last extremity, and had assured her,
that a consent, given under these circumstances, could never have any
validity.[*]
So far the queen of Scots seemed plainly to have the advantage in the
contest; and the English commissioners might have been surprised that
Murray had made so weak a defence, and had suppressed all the material
imputations against that princess, on which his party had ever so
strenuously insisted, had not some private conferences previously
informed them of the secret. Mary’s commissioners had boasted that
Elizabeth, from regard to her kinswoman, and from her desire of
maintaining the rights of sovereigns, was determined, how criminal
soever the conduct of that princess might appear, to restore her to the
throne;[**] and Murray, reflecting on some past measures of the English
court, began to apprehend that there were but too just grounds for these
expectations. He believed that Mary, if he would agree to conceal the
most violent part of the accusation against her, would submit to any
reasonable terms of accommodation; but if he once proceeded so far as to
charge her with the whole of her guilt, no composition could afterwards
take place; and should she ever be restored, either by the power of
Elizabeth or the assistance of her other friends, he and his party must
be exposed to her severe and implacable vengeance.[***] He resolved,
therefore, not to venture rashly on a measure which it would be
impossible for him ever to recall; and he privately paid a visit to
Norfolk and the other English commissioners, confessed his scruples,
laid before them the evidence of the queen’s guilt, and desired to have
some security for Elizabeth’s protection, in case that evidence should,
upon examination, appear entirely satisfactory. Norfolk was not secretly
displeased with these scruples of the regent.[****]
* Anderson, vol. iv. part ii. p. 60, et seq. Goodall, vol.
ii. p. 162.
** Anderson, vol. iv. part ii. p. 45. Goodall, vol. ii. p.
127.
*** Anderson, vol. iv. part ii. p. 47, 48. Goodall, vol. ii.
p. 159.
**** Crawford, p. 92. Melvil, p. 94, 95. Haynes, p. 574.