The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol. I., Part E.: From Charles I. to Cromwell
David Hume · en
and which alone had thrown off allegiance, and could be reduced to
obedience: that it could be proved, as well by the evidence of all the
king's ministers, as by the known disposition of the forces, that the
intention never was to land the Irish army in England, but in Scotland:
that of six other counsellors present, Laud and Windebank could give
no evidence; Northumberland, Hamilton, Cottington, and Juxon, could
recollect no such expression; and the advice was too remarkable to be
easily forgotten: that it was nowise probable such a desperate counsel
would be openly delivered at the board, and before Northumberland, a
person of that high rank, and whose attachments to the court were
so much weaker than his connections with the country. That though
Northumberland, and he alone, had recollected some such expression
as that of "being absolved from rules of government," yet, in such
desperate extremities as those into which the king and kingdom were
then fallen, a maxim of that nature, allowing it to be delivered by
Strafford, may be defended upon principles the most favorable to law
and liberty and that nothing could be more iniquitous than to extract
an accusation of treason from an opinion simply proposed at the council
table; where all freedom of debate ought to be permitted, and where it
was not unusual for the members, in order to draw forth the sentiments
of others, to propose counsels very remote from their own secret advice
and judgment.[*]
The evidence of Secretary Vane, though exposed to such unsurmountable
objections, was the real cause of Strafford' unhappy fate; and made the
bill of attainder pass the commons with no greater opposition than that
of fifty-nine dissenting votes. But there remained two other branches of
the legislature, the king and the lords, whose assent was requisite;
and these, if left to their free judgment, it was easily foreseen,
would reject the bill without scruple or deliberation. To overcome this
difficulty, the popular leaders employed expedients for which they were
beholden partly to their own industry, partly to the indiscretion of
their adversaries.
Next Sunday, after the bill passed the commons, the Puritanical pulpits
resounded with declamations concerning the necessity of executing
justice upon great delinquents.[**] The populace took the alarm. About
six thousand men, armed with swords and cudgels, flocked from the
city, and surrounded the houses of parliament.[***] The names of the
fifty-nine commoners who had voted against the bill of attainder, were
posted up under the title of "Straffordians, and betrayers of their
country." These were exposed to all the insults of the ungovernable
multitude. When any of the lords passed, the cry for justice against
Strafford resounded in their ears; and such as were suspected of
friendship to that obnoxious minister, were sure to meet with menaces,
not unaccompanied with symptoms of the most desperate resolutions in the
furious populace.[****]