The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol. I., Part E.: From Charles I. to Cromwell
David Hume · en
The committee brought into the house that remonstrance which has become
so memorable, and which was soon afterwards attended with such important
consequences. It was not addressed to the king; but was openly declared
to be an appeal to the people. The harshness of the matter was equalled
by the severity of the language. It consists of many gross falsehoods,
intermingled with some evident truths: malignant insinuations are
joined to open invectives; loud complaints of the past, accompanied with
jealous prognostications of the future. Whatever unfortunate, whatever
invidious, whatever suspicious measure had been embraced by the king,
from the commencement of his reign, is insisted on and aggravated with
merciless rhetoric: the unsuccessful expeditions to Cadiz and the Isle
of Rhé are mentioned; the sending of ships to France for the suppression
of the Hugonots; the forced loans; the illegal confinement of men
for not obeying illegal commands; the violent dissolution of four
parliaments; the arbitrary government which always succeeded; the
questioning, fining, and imprisoning of members for their conduct in
the house; the levying of taxes without consent of the commons; the
introducing of superstitious innovations into the church, without
authority of law: in short, every thing which, either with or without
reason, had given offence during the course of fifteen years, from the
accession of the king to the calling of the present parliament. And
though all these grievances had been already redressed, and even laws
enacted for future security against their return, the praise of these
advantages was ascribed, not to the king, but to the parliament, who had
extorted his consent to such salutary statutes. Their own merits too,
they asserted, towards the king, were no less eminent than towards the
people. Though they had seized his whole revenue, rendered it totally
precarious, and made even their temporary supplies be paid to their own
commissioners, who were independent of him, they pretended that they
had liberally supported him in his necessities. By an insult still more
egregious, the very giving of money to the Scots for levying war against
their sovereign, they represented as an instance of their duty towards
him. And all their grievances, they said, which amounted to no less
than a total subversion of the constitution, proceeded entirely from the
formed combination of a Popish faction, who had ever swayed the king's
counsels, who had endeavored, by an uninterrupted effort, to introduce
their superstition into England and Scotland, and who had now at last
excited an open and bloody rebellion in Ireland.[*]