The Lion of Poland: The Story of Paderewski — David Hume — John Shaqi
The Lion of Poland: The Story of Paderewski
David Hume · en
Although certain of his friends advised against the step, the fact of
the matter was that Paderewski had no choice. He had to return to the
stage because it was the only way he knew how to make a living. He had
to work for a living because he had no money. He, who had been the
richest artist appearing before the public, was now all but penniless.
Nearly all of his great fortune had been given away to the war-hungry
people of Europe.
The announcement created a sensation. Paderewski was returning to the
stage! Newspaper editorials around the world—and even his close friends
and staunchest admirers—asked the same question: would his second
concert career be a triumph or a failure? Yet the answer should have
been clear to anyone who gave a moment’s thought to Paderewski’s life
and work. Clearly he would never have made the decision to return to the
scenes of his former greatness if he had not been sure of his own powers
and of his ability to use them again as fully as before.
But never before had Paderewski spent more painstaking hours on his
beloved music than he did in the months just before his second Carnegie
Hall debut. The great French violinist, Jacques Thibaud, who crossed the
Atlantic with him, said that Paderewski even sacrificed his favorite
pastime of bridge in favor of extra hours of practicing.
It was thirty-one years, almost to the very day, since his
well-remembered debut in Carnegie Hall in 1891. Now, on November 22,
1922, he walked out on the famous stage to begin again. This time an
audience that months before had bought every seat in the house filled
the hall with a great cheering at his entrance, and kept up the applause
until he seated himself at the Steinway and struck the few chords with
which he always liked to quiet his listeners. That he was nervous was
certain. But that his fingers had every ounce of the control, of the
magic singing sound, and the thundering excitement they had had in the
past was clear to him and to his audience. It was clear, also, to the
critics, who were unanimous as they sought, almost desperately, to
describe the mature playing of this man who was now so much more than a
pianist.
There was no dissent anywhere from the critical opinions. But there was
one special friend who, under unique circumstances, summed it up better
than any other. He was Georges Clemenceau, France’s wartime premier.
On the night before his own return concert in Carnegie Hall, Paderewski
had gone to the Metropolitan Opera House to hear Clemenceau speak. But
Clemenceau had to make another speech on November 22 and had not been
able to hear the great triumph of Paderewski’s return. When Paderewski’s
concert was over, he was driven to the home of Charles Dana Gibson, a
fashionable artist of the day, with whom Clemenceau was staying. There,
the two men greeted each other with the deepest affection.