Two English queens and Philip — David Hume — John Shaqi
Two English queens and Philip
David Hume · en
Even Philip’s enemies, the Venetians, testified to the change of
his demeanour during his stay in England; and Soriano, the outgoing
ambassador, said that from that time forward, even in Spain, his gentle
courtesy and kindness were continued habitually, whilst Michaeli, the
new Venetian ambassador, who was the staunch ally of Noailles, was
emphatic in his testimony of Philip’s affability in England, and says
that his conduct towards his wife was such as to make any woman love
him: “for in truth no one in the world could have been a better or more
affectionate husband.” Yet another Venetian envoy, Damula, accredited
to the Emperor, wrote that on disembarking in England the Prince was
“remarked by everybody for his graciousness, without any stiffness or
assumption of royal ceremony, mixing with the courtiers rather as a
comrade than as a king.” Certain it is, with public opinion in England
strongly unfavourable and in a perfect panic of apprehension, Philip’s
tact and graciousness to a great extent overcame the prejudice against
him, and he became in a few months personally quite popular, whilst he
contrived almost immediately to gain his wife’s devoted affection. The
over-coloured picture of Philip as a trembling, seasick creature,[50]
in daily fear of poison, which Froude drew from the letters of Noailles
and the account of the Venetian, Baoardo, needs much modification to be
near the impartial truth; for though, as we have seen, Philip looked
upon the marriage as a sacrifice to reasons of State, as undoubtedly it
was, he bore his cross gaily and like a well-bred gentleman. If he had
done otherwise, indeed, as he was quite clever enough to recognise, the
sacrifice itself would have been useless.