[47] The “I think” is, as has been already stated, an empirical
proposition, and contains the proposition, “I exist.” But I cannot
say, “Everything, which thinks, exists”; for in this case the property
of thought would constitute all beings possessing it, necessary
beings. Hence my existence cannot be considered as an inference from
the proposition, “I think,” as Descartes maintained—because in this
case the major premiss, “Everything, which thinks, exists,” must
precede—but the two propositions are identical. The proposition, “I
think,” expresses an undetermined empirical intuition, that perception
(proving consequently that sensation, which must belong to
sensibility, lies at the foundation of this proposition); but it
precedes experience, whose province it is to determine an object of
perception by means of the categories in relation to time; and
existence in this proposition is not a category, as it does not apply
to an undetermined given object, but only to one of which we have a
conception, and about which we wish to know whether it does or does
not exist, out of, and apart from this conception. An undetermined
perception signifies here merely something real that has been given,
only, however, to thought in general—but not as a phenomenon, nor as a
thing in itself (noumenon), but only as something that really exists,
and is designated as such in the proposition, “I think.” For it must
be remarked that, when I call the proposition, “I think,” an empirical
proposition, I do not thereby mean that the Ego in the proposition is
an empirical representation; on the contrary, it is purely
intellectual, because it belongs to thought in general. But without
some empirical representation, which presents to the mind material for
thought, the mental act, “I think,” would not take place; and the
empirical is only the condition of the application or employment of
the pure intellectual faculty.
Thus, then, appears the vanity of the hope of establishing a cognition
which is to extend its rule beyond the limits of experience—a cognition
which is one of the highest interests of humanity; and thus is proved
the futility of the attempt of speculative philosophy in this region of
thought. But, in this interest of thought, the severity of criticism
has rendered to reason a not unimportant service, by the demonstration
of the impossibility of making any dogmatical affirmation concerning an
object of experience beyond the boundaries of experience. She has thus
fortified reason against all affirmations of the contrary. Now, this
can be accomplished in only two ways. Either our proposition must be
proved apodeictically; or, if this is unsuccessful, the sources of this
inability must be sought for, and, if these are discovered to exist in
the natural and necessary limitation of our reason, our opponents must
submit to the same law of renunciation and refrain from advancing
claims to dogmatic assertion.