30,000 locked out : $b the great strike of the building trades in Chicago — John Locke — John Shaqi
30,000 locked out : $b the great strike of the building trades in Chicago
John Locke · en
The contractor must sign such indentures as are prepared by the
Union without consultation with him. "No contractor will be allowed
to have an apprentice over eighteen years of age unless he be the
son of a journeyman who is a member of the Union." Apprentices must
also be members. The contractor is thus debarred from putting his
own son at apprenticeship if he happens to be eighteen years of
age. This appears to be most emphatic special legislation. In fact
the whole management and control of apprentices is virtually in the
hands of the Union, and we submit again that such action as this is
most indefensive and pernicious. It has already caused a tremendous
reduction in the number of young men learning the trade, and, if
practiced in other branches of business, would create a state of
revolt among the people, and would be denounced throughout the
length and breadth of the land as a violation of rights heretofore
supposed to be secured when this country became a Republic.
Foremen upon the work must be members of the Union. Inspectors upon
public buildings must be practical bricklayers in the opinion of
the Union, and members of it; in fact there are so many points that
demonstrate the development of this one-sided power of the Union,
and showing abuse of their place and mission that we cannot take
time or space to enlarge upon them.
To our mind the Constitution of this Union, and many others, is
framed upon the assumption that all employers are dishonest and bad
men, so all are to suffer alike.
The Union seem to have come to the conclusion that the laws of the
land are not sufficient, and they propose to be not only a law unto
themselves but a law unto all others who come in contact with them.
This assumption, if permitted to stand and grow, will tend to
disintegrate the whole social and political fabric upon which
citizens of this country depend for protection; and we believe it
to be our duty to call upon all good citizens to deny it in
unequivocal terms.
We submit that these "rules" which we have quoted, and other
customs which have naturally grown from such development of power
(which are neither written or admitted by the Union, but which
nevertheless exist), are distinctly an encroachment upon the
province of the employer; that under them he is robbed of that
control and authority absolutely essential to the proper conduct of
his business.
Submission to such dictation as this simply opens the door wider
for interference, and the employer is not secure from day to day
from new and harassing demands, so that eventually he will have
practically nothing left to him but the "privilege" of paying the
bills.