30,000 locked out : $b the great strike of the building trades in Chicago
John Locke · en
The vote on the motion to appoint the committee was lost, only eight
voting in favor of it.
A motion was made to lay the communication on the table, which
prevailed, only ten voting against it.
Mr. G. C. Prussing submitted the following, which was adopted as the
sense of the meeting, with but one dissenting vote:
The position of this Association can hardly be misunderstood at
this late day. It has been laid down in our platform in
unmistakable language, and is further contained in an address to
the Bricklayers and Stonemasons of Chicago and published by the
public press.
We have addressed them as individuals, and shall continue to treat
them as individuals, not an organization. Principles can never be
subject to arbitration. And such matters as can properly be
arbitrated--such as hours of work, wages, or other working
rules--can not be discussed with any committee until an
organization is in existence which has adopted the principle of
individual liberty freely and fully, and is governed by
constitution and by-laws based thereon.
This community has suffered too often and too long, and the
sacrifices brought have been too great to listen to any hint of a
possible arbitration or compromise. We owe it to ourselves; to the
other building trades who have taken the position held by us, we
owe it to the entire community to settle the present troubles
right. That is, on a basis that promises security against future
arbitrary interruptions of business.
To individuals we are ready to give work; we guarantee them steady
employment as far as in our power, and will protect them in every
way, and if the men who now take up their tools should choose to
form an organization for mutual protection and any other honorable
and lawful purposes, based on the principles we acknowledge, we
will aid and assist them in perfecting such organization, and will
treat with them, and arbitrate any and all questions properly
subject to arbitration.
After the meeting adjourned Mr. Downey sent a communication to Mr.
Vorkeller in reply to his letter, of which the following is a copy: