History of Florence and of the Affairs of Italy: From the Earliest Times to the Death of Lorenzo the Magnificent
Niccolo Machiavelli · en
It will perhaps appear to the readers of the preceding book that,
professing only to write of the affairs of Florence, I have dilated too
much in speaking of those which occurred in Lombardy and Naples. But
as I have not already avoided, so it is not my intention in future to
forbear, similar digressions. For although we have not engaged to
give an account of the affairs of Italy, still it would be improper
to neglect noticing the most remarkable of them. If they were wholly
omitted, our history would not be so well understood, neither would it
be so instructive or agreeable; since from the proceedings of the other
princes and states of Italy, have most commonly arisen those wars in
which the Florentines were compelled to take part. Thus, from the
war between John of Anjou and King Ferrando, originated those serious
enmities and hatreds which ensued between Ferrando and the Florentines,
particularly the house of Medici. The king complained of a want of
assistance during the war, and of the aid afforded to his enemy; and
from his anger originated the greatest evils, as will be hereafter seen.
Having, in speaking of external affairs, come down to the year 1463, it
will be necessary in order to make our narrative of the contemporaneous
domestic transactions clearly understood, to revert to a period several
years back. But first, according to custom, I would offer a few remarks
referring to the events about to be narrated, and observe, that those
who think a republic may be kept in perfect unity of purpose are greatly
deceived. True it is, that some divisions injure republics, while others
are beneficial to them. When accompanied by factions and parties they
are injurious; but when maintained without them they contribute to their
prosperity. The legislator of a republic, since it is impossible to
prevent the existence of dissensions, must at least take care to prevent
the growth of faction. It may therefore be observed, that citizens
acquire reputation and power in two ways; the one public, the other
private. Influence is acquired publicly by winning a battle, taking
possession of a territory, fulfilling the duties of an embassy with
care and prudence, or by giving wise counsel attended by a happy result.
Private methods are conferring benefits upon individuals, defending them
against the magistrates, supporting them with money, and raising them to
undeserved honors; or with public games and entertainments gaining the
affection of the populace. This mode of procedure produces parties and
cliques; and in proportion as influence thus acquired is injurious, so
is the former beneficial, if quite free from party spirit; because it is
founded upon the public good, and not upon private advantage. And though
it is impossible to prevent the existence of inveterate feuds, still
if they be without partisans to support them for their own individual
benefit, they do not injure a republic, but contribute to its welfare;